IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaeacj/186728.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Margin Protection Program for Dairy Producers: Implementation, Participation and Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Bozic, Marin
  • Wolf, Christopher
  • Yang, Fanda
  • Newton, John
  • Thraen, Cameron S.

Abstract

In the period leading up to the start of the Margin Protection Program for Dairy Producers (MPP-Dairy), a survey was undertaken to assess dairy farmer knowledge, attitudes, impressions and expected participation decisions. All surveys were collected in July and August 2014. There are six main conclusions of the survey. First, prior to the announcement of USDA rules regarding MPP-Dairy, most dairy producers felt they had ‘some knowledge’ of the program, with close to 30 percent declaring ‘no knowledge’ about the program. Second, about thirty percent of respondents had somewhat or very favorable impressions of MPP-Dairy while similar percent had somewhat or very unfavorable. Top four concerns about the program were too much government involvement, program complexity, lack of supply management and fear that the program would distort market signals to farmers. Third, close to 40 percent of producers indicated they were leaning towards registering for MPP-Dairy, while 30 percent were leaning against participation. Over 30 percent of producers had not decided if they would to participate or not. More knowledge about MPP-Dairy was associated with higher likelihood of participation. Fourth, we asked dairy farmers which coverage level they would choose in most years. Distribution of responses had two pronounced peaks, with $4.00/cwt and $6.00/cwt chosen by 28 and 25 percent of producers respectively. No other coverage choice was chosen by more than 12 percent of producers. Fifth, just under 70 percent of LGM-Dairy users indicated that when faced with a one-time irreversible choice between LGM-Dairy and MPP-Dairy, they would choose MPP-Dairy. Finally, just under 25 percent of producers indicated MPP-Dairy would ‘somewhat’ reduce their use of other risk management tools, while 18 percent replied they expected a ‘strong reduction’ in their use of other risk management instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bozic, Marin & Wolf, Christopher & Yang, Fanda & Newton, John & Thraen, Cameron S., 2014. "Margin Protection Program for Dairy Producers: Implementation, Participation and Consequences," 2014 AAEA: Crop Insurance and the 2014 Farm Bill Symposium: Implementing Change in U.S. Agricultural Policy, October 8-9, 2014, Louisville, KY 186728, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeacj:186728
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.186728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/186728/files/AAEA%20Crop%20Insurance%20Sym%202014%20Bozic%20et%20al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.186728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Newton & Cameron S. Thraen & Marin Bozic, 2016. "Evaluating Policy Design Choices for the Margin Protection Program for Dairy Producers: An Expected Indemnity Approach," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 712-730.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Production Economics; Risk and Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeacj:186728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.