Estimating PIGLOG Demands Using Representative versus Average Expenditure
AbstractEconomists often use aggregate time series data to estimate consumer demand functions. Some of the popular applied demand systems have a PIGLOG form. In the most general PIGLOG cases the “average” demand for a good is a function of the representative consumer expenditure not the average consumer expenditure. We would need detailed information on each period’s expenditure distribution to calculate the representative expenditure. This information is generally unavailable, so average expenditures are invariably used. Since we are estimating these demand systems using the wrong expenditure terms, our estimates may be wrong. There are special cases where the average expenditure is a perfect proxy for the representative expenditure. We do an indirect test of this case by estimating a demand system using quarterly U.S. data on three categories of consumer expenditure. To the usual price and expenditure effects we added variables that may be associated with shifts in the distribution of expenditure.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association in its series 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. with number 149351.
Date of creation: 20 May 2013
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: (414) 276-3349
Web page: http://www.aaea.org
More information through EDIRC
consumer demand; aggregation; Consumer/Household Economics; Demand and Price Analysis; C32; D11; D12;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
- D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
- D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2013-06-04 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hahn, William F., 1988. "Effects of Income Distribution on Meat Demand," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, issue 2.
- Barten, A. P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 7-73.
- Nicholas E. Piggott, 2000. "The Incidence of the Costs and Benefits of Generic Advertising," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(3), pages 665-671.
- Keller, W.J. & Van Driel, J., 1985. "Differential consumer demand systems," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 375-390.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.