IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea10/61537.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Local and Organic: Substitutes or Complements? An In-Store Evaluation of Labels for Apples

Author

Listed:
  • Costanigro, Marco
  • Kroll, Stephan
  • Thilmany, Dawn D.
  • Nurse, Gretchen

Abstract

Over the past two decades, consumer demand for niche products has grown substantially. The primary objective of this paper is to disentangle the value consumers place on two prominent food claims, organic and local (defined as Colorado Proud in this study) as they relate to fresh produce. Using primary data from a choice experiment conducted in a grocery store that has conducted co-promotional efforts with the Colorado Proud program, we found the value of the “local” claims trumps that of “organic” in apples. However, the difference in results between the experiments that offered participants either one- or two-pounds is far more pronounced, illustrating how scaling may influence estimates in such market-based research.

Suggested Citation

  • Costanigro, Marco & Kroll, Stephan & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Nurse, Gretchen, 2010. "Local and Organic: Substitutes or Complements? An In-Store Evaluation of Labels for Apples," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61537, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea10:61537
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.61537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/61537/files/Marco-Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.61537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea10:61537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.