IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea05/19302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Practical Guide to Market Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, Roy Justin
  • Sterns, James A.

Abstract

The authors address the fundamental question, "How does one analyze the potential of a given product for a given market?" A review of the literature suggests that numerous authors have proposed a relatively consistent set of questions that need to be addressed, information sought and key issues to consider when conducting market assessments. The goal of this paper is to review this literature and assemble a set of references that provide insights on how to analyze the market potential of agricultural and food products. This process is of growing importance as U.S. agricultural producers and processors seek to market differentiated products, seek out direct marketing opportunities and focus on meeting consumer preferences for food product attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, Roy Justin & Sterns, James A., 2005. "A Practical Guide to Market Assessment," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19302, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19302
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19302/files/sp05ta04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul M. Patterson & Hans Olofsson & Timothy J. Richards & Sharon Sass, 1999. "An empirical analysis of state agricultural product promotions: A case study on Arizona Grown," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 179-196.
    2. Eastwood, David B. & Brooker, John R. & Orr, Robert H., 1987. "Consumer Preferences for Local Versus Out-Of-State Grown Selected Fresh Produce: The Case of Knoxville, Tennessee," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 183-194, December.
    3. Eastwood, David B. & Brooker, John R. & Orr, Robert H., 1987. "Consumer Preferences For Local Versus Out-Of-State Grown Selected Fresh Produce: The Case Of Knoxville, Tennessee," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos E. Carpio & Olga Isengildina-Massa, 2009. "Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 412-426.
    2. Maples, McKenzie & Morgan, Kimberly L. & Interis, Matthew G. & Harri, Ardian, 2013. "Who Buys Food Directly from Producers in the Southeastern United States?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 509-518, August.
    3. Carlos E. Carpio & Olga Isengildina-Massa, 2016. "Does Government-sponsored Advertising Increase Social Welfare? A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 239-259.
    4. Konrád Kiss & Csaba Ruszkai & Antónia Szűcs & Gábor Koncz, 2020. "Examining the Role of Local Products in Rural Development in the Light of Consumer Preferences—Results of a Consumer Survey from Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Terry, Danny E. & Tabor, Richard L., 1990. "Consumer Acceptance Of Irradiated Food Products: An Apple Marketing Study," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 21(2), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Willis, David B. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Boys, Kathryn A. & Young, Emily D., 2013. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Locally Grown Produce Designed to Support Local Food Banks and Enhance Locally Grown Producer Markets," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150288, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Yang, Shang-Ho & Woods, Timothy, 2014. "The Divergence of Defining Local Food – Consumer Co-op versus Conventional Grocery Shoppers," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170480, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Ojo Olutope Stephen & Olofinsao A. Oluwatosin & Abdulaleem A. Medinat, 2020. "Analysis of Consumer Preference for Cassava Products in Akoko South West Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Social Sciences Perspectives, Online Academic Press, vol. 7(1), pages 46-52.
    9. Merritt, Meagan G. & Delong, Karen Lewis & Griffith, Andrew P. & Jensen, Kimberly L., 2018. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Tennessee Certified Beef," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 233-254, May.
    10. Beamer, Bobby G. & Preston, Warren P., 1991. "Shelf Space Allocation In The Produce Department: Implications For Marketing Specialty Produce," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 22(3), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Wuyang HU & Ping QING & Marvin BATTE & Tim WOODS & Stam ERNST, 2013. "What is local and for what foods does it matter?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(10), pages 454-466.
    12. Martinez, Stephen W. & Hand, Michael S. & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan L. & Ralston, Katherine L. & Smith, Travis A. & Vogel, Stephen J. & Clark, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah A. & Newman, , 2010. "Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues," Economic Research Report 96635, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
      • Martinez, Steve & Hand, Michael & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan & Ralston, Katherine & Smith, Travis & Vogel, Stephen & Clarke, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah & Newman, Constance, 2010. "Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues," MPRA Paper 24313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Konrád Kiss & Gábor Koncz & Dóra Nagy-Demeter & Bálint Varró & Mercédesz Németh & Csaba Ruszkai, 2019. "Survey of Consumers Responsiveness to Small-Scale Producers Marketing in the Northern Hungary Region," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 15(01), pages 25-34.
    14. Brown, Cheryl & Gandee, Jesse E. & D'Souza, Gerard E., 2006. "West Virginia Farm Direct Marketing: A County Level Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Faical Akaichi & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Lawton Lanier Nalley, 2017. "Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(1), pages 3-31.
    16. Eastwood, David B. & Brooker, John R. & Gray, Morgan D., 1999. "Location And Other Market Attributes Affecting Farmer'S Market Patronage: The Case Of Tennessee," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 1-10, March.
    17. Schupp, Alvin R. & Dellenbarger, Lynn E., 1993. "The Effectiveness Of State Logos For Farm-Raised Catfish," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 24(2), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Uematsu, Hiroki & Mishra, Ashok K., 2011. "Use of Direct Marketing Strategies by Farmers and Their Impact on Farm Business Income," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Giraud, Kelly L. & Bond, Craig A. & Bond, Jennifer Keeling, 2005. "Consumer Preferences for Locally Made Specialty Food Products Across Northern New England," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Carpio, Carlos E. & Mathews, Leah G. & Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Perrett, Allison & Descieux, Katie, 2015. "Evaluating the Marketing Impact of a Regional Branding Program Using Contingent Valuation Methods: The Case of the Appalachian Grown™ Branding Program," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205800, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.