Building on earlier work by Cramer, this paper tests for price-advertising interaction effects in the U.S. non-alcoholic beverage market. Full and restricted specifications of the Rotterdam model are tested along with compensated and first difference double-log models using annual time-series data for the period 1970-2000. Results are mixed in that the full Rotterdam and first difference double-log models fail to reject the null hypothesis of no rotation while the restricted Rotterdam and compensated double-log models indicate rejection. One reason for the ambiguous results may be multicollinearity problems associated with the unrestricted models. Still, our overall conclusion is that there is little solid evidence to suggest that generic advertising rotated the demand curves for non-alcoholic beverages in the United States.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) in its series 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO with number
20391.
Length: Date of creation: 2004 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea04:20391
Contact details of provider: Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 Phone: (414) 918-3190 Fax: (414) 276-3349 Email: Web page: http://www.aaea.org More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: