IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea02/19735.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consequences Of Federal Manure Management Proposals: Cost To Swine Operations From Land Applying Manure

Author

Listed:
  • Ribaudo, Marc
  • Agapoff, Jean
  • Gollehon, Noel R.
  • Aillery, Marcel P.

Abstract

A manure application cost model was used with survey data to examine the costs to confined swine operations of meeting proposed mandatory nutrient management plans across regions and size classes. Sector costs are examined under alternative scenarios involving nutrient standards, and owner willingness to accept, and the use of phytase.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribaudo, Marc & Agapoff, Jean & Gollehon, Noel R. & Aillery, Marcel P., 2002. "Consequences Of Federal Manure Management Proposals: Cost To Swine Operations From Land Applying Manure," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19735, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19735
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19735/files/sp02ri01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald A. Fleming & Bruce Babcock & Erda Wang, 1998. "Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 96-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Somda, Zana C. & Allison, John R. & Ely, L.O. & Newton, G.L. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2003. "Economic And Environmental Evaluation Of Dairy Manure Utilization For Year Round Crop Production," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35167, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Gollehon, Noel R. & Christensen, Lee A. & Ribaudo, Marc & Aillery, Marcel P. & Agapoff, Jean & Breneman, Vincent E., 2002. "Estimating The Economic Potential For Off-Farm Manure Processing," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19791, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Johansson, Robert C., 2003. "When The !%$? Hits The Land: Implications For Us Agriculture And Environment When Land Application Of Manure Is Constrained," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22002, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Key, Nigel D. & Kaplan, Jonathan D., 2007. "Multiple Environmental Externalities and Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Somda, Zana C. & Allison, John R. & Ely, L.O. & Newton, G.L. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2003. "Economic And Environmental Evaluation Of Dairy Manure Utilization For Year Round Crop Production," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35167, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Fan, Yubing & McCann, Laura M., 2017. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems and Scientific Scheduling Practices: An Application of Multilevel Models," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258458, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Key, Nigel D., 2004. "Manure Application Standards and EQIP Payments: The Distribution of Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits across US Hog Farms," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19937, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Erich von Stroheim & Dana Loyd Keske Hoag, 2021. "Valuing Cattle Manure as an Agricultural Resource for Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14565, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Harsh, Stephen B., 2005. "Optimal livestock diet formulation with farm environmental compliance consequences," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19427, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Fleming, Ronald A., 1998. "Using Setback Requirements As An Economic Incentive To Reduce Livestock Waste Odors," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20838, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Marc Ribaudo & Andrea Cattaneo & Jean Agapoff, 2004. "Cost of Meeting Manure Nutrient Application Standards in Hog Production: The Roles of EQIP and Fertilizer Offsets," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 430-444.
    12. Azzeddine Azzam & Gibson Nene & Karina Schoengold, 2015. "Hog Industry Structure and the Stringency of Environmental Regulation," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 333-358, September.
    13. Paudel, Krishna P. & McIntosh, Christopher S., 2000. "Economics Of Poultry Litter Utilization And Optimal Environmental Policy For Phosphorus Disposal In Georgia," Series Reports 23813, Auburn University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    14. Liu, Yazhou & Ji, Yueqing & Shao, Shuai & Zhong, Funing & Zhang, Ning & Chen, Yishan, 2017. "Scale of Production, Agglomeration and Agricultural Pollutant Treatment: Evidence From a Survey in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 30-45.
    15. Ribaudo, Marc & Agapoff, Jean & Cattaneo, Andrea, 2003. "Can Eqip Be Effective In Helping Farmers Meet Manure Management Goals?," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22025, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Iho, Antti & Parker, Doug & Zilberman, David, 2015. "Optimal Regional Regulation of Animal Waste," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211780, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Aillery, Marcel P. & Gollehon, Noel & Breneman, Vincent E., 2005. "Technical Documentation of the Regional Manure Management Model for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed," Technical Bulletins 184315, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Yap, Crystal & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V. & Doering, Otto C., III, 2001. "The Economic Impacts Of Phosphorus-Based Manure Management Policies On A Representative North Central Indiana Hog-Grain Farm," Staff Papers 28642, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    19. Massey, Raymond E. & Gedikoglu, Haluk, 2021. "Manure application rules and environmental considerations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Wang, Jingjing, 2022. "Harnessing natural attenuation to reduce CAFOs nitrate emissions: An integrated modeling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.