This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Welfare Impacts of Domestic and International Agricultural Efficiency Gains – A South African Case Study

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
McDonald, Scott
Pauw, Kalie
Punt, Cecilia

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

A large proportion of the on-going reductions in global food prices are attributable to the efficiency gains associated with various ‘green revolutions’. Unfortunately the welfare gains associated with such productivity growth are unevenly distributed, with many African states reaping relatively few benefits. One possible reason for this is the failure of African agriculture to retain its relative competitiveness in global agricultural and food markets, and hence, the welfare gains associated with reductions in consumer prices are largely offset by the welfare losses associated with reductions in producer prices. The analyses reported in this paper explore how changes in domestic and international agricultural efficiency will impact upon the welfare of households and the profitability of agricultural and food industries in South Africa. The results are generated from a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for South Africa with highly disaggregated food and agricultural sectors. The scenarios reported focus on three dimensions of domestic technology change; changes in the efficiencies with which intermediate inputs, primary inputs and land are used, and one international dimension; changes in the world prices of agricultural and food products. The results indicate that both domestic and international efficiency gains have positive net welfare effects for South Africa. In the case of domestic efficiency gains the net benefit is marginally greater, mainly because of the smaller negative welfare consequences for domestic producers. This can be explained by domestic producers’ increased penetration of export markets, which offsets the negative welfare effects associated with a reduction in producer prices. The paper concludes with an assessment of the differential impacts upon the agronomic regions of South Africa and the different household types. These results suggest that while the distribution of the consumer benefits is biased towards poorer households, the distribution of the producer benefits is biased towards relatively richer agricultural areas.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/9522
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) in its series 2004 Inaugural Symposium, December 6-8, 2004, Nairobi, Kenya with number 9522.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:aaaeke:9522

Contact details of provider:
Postal: c/o FORMAT, 5th Floor, Muthaiga Mini Market, Limuru Road, P.O. Box 79 - 00621Village Market, Nairobi, Kenya
Phone: 254 20 6752866
Email:
Web page: http://www.aaae-africa.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).

Related research
Keywords: Productivity Analysis;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. McDonald, Scott, 2003. "The PROVIDE Project Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model," Technical Paper Series 15627, PROVIDE Project. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Kalie Pauw & Morné Oosthuizen & Carlene van der Westhuizen, 2006. "Graduate Unemployment in the Face of Skills Shortages: A Labour Market Paradox," Working Papers 9604, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.