IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adl/cieswp/2002-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Regulatory Harmonization Efficient? The Case of Agricultural Biotechnology Labelling

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Ann Jackson

    (School of Economics, University of Adelaide, Australia)

Abstract

This research uses a general equilibrium framework to examine the impacts of labeling policies on genetically modified (GM) agricultural products in the international trading system. The research focuses on the case of the policy debate between the United States and the European Union. Numerical calibrations of the general equilibrium model using 1998 data are used to examine four scenarios: both countries labeling, neither country labeling and the two cases when countries pursue mixed strategies. Results indicate that the benefits of countries pursuing mixed strategies outweigh the benefits of harmonized labeling policies. Countries that introduce labeling regulations restrict access to their agricultural markets. However, the benefits consumers obtain from having access to information about GM content compensate for the trade inefficiencies introduced by differing national labeling regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Ann Jackson, 2002. "Is Regulatory Harmonization Efficient? The Case of Agricultural Biotechnology Labelling," Centre for International Economic Studies Working Papers 2002-06, University of Adelaide, Centre for International Economic Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:adl:cieswp:2002-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cies/papers/0206.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jackson, Lee Ann, 2003. "Who Benefits from Quality Labelling? Segregation Costs, International Trade and Producer Outcomes," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57897, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Saunders, Caroline M. & Cagatay, Selim, 2003. "Commercial release of first-generation genetically modified food products in New Zealand: using a partial equilibrium trade model to assess the impact on producer returns in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Caroline Saunders & Selim Cagatay, 2003. "Commercial release of firstā€generation genetically modified food products in New Zealand: using a partial equilibrium trade model to assess the impact on producer returns in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 233-259, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adl:cieswp:2002-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dmitriy Kvasov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cieadau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.