In this paper we argue that sub-national public units do have a wide range of innovation policy related tools and thus the opportunity to conduct a proper and effective innovation policy, independently from superior policy levels. However, as the following example of Bavarian technology and innovation policy in the field of biotechnology discloses, several crucial particularities have to be taken into account. These are on the one hand organisational specifications of the promoted industry, on the other hand the connectivity to policy programmes on higher policy levels. To examine that kind of policy measures, the authors have applied a new biographical method on the firm level. In so doing we thoroughly examined knowledge and financial flows of biotechnology companies in the Munich area and were hence able to soundly qualify the impact of sub-national policy measures. As a consequence the authors were enabled to identify key institutional arrangements, as the focus on one specific location (clustering), the setting up of public support organizations as well as public Venture Capital (VC), and others. The surprising result of our survey: Munich firms benefited much more from sub-national policies than from any other policy level.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies in its series DRUID Working Papers with number
08-21.