This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A comparative study of sourcing strategies

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Niels Peter Mols () (Department of Management, University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Poul H. Andersen () (The Aarhus School of Business)
David Birks () (School of Management, University of Bath, England)
Per Nikolaj D. Bukh () (Department of Management, University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Abstract

Industrial consumers' use of single, dual or multiple sourcing strategies indicate, for example, how loyal they are towards their suppliers and whether they are transaction-oriented or relationship-oriented. in consequence, information about buyers' sourcing strategies is useful for sellers when evaluating and targeting different customer segments. This paper starts by reviewing the literature on single, dual, and multiple sourcing. It then goes on to investigate possible relationships between European corporate customers' sourcing strategies with regard to their domestic cash management banks in 1996 and 1998, and their intentions to increase or decrease the number of banks they use. It then goes on to examine their sourcing strategies by their geographical location, company size, industry type and market coverage. A questionnaire completed by more than 1000 corporate customers in 1996 and 1998 reveals that in most European countries the number of companies using three or more banks has decreased. Futher, it indicates that the single sourcing segment is large in Austria, Ireland, and Norway. The segment relying on dual sourcing is large in the Scandinavian countries, whereas the segment using three or more banks is the largest in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. No strong significant relationship is found between the descriptors of sourcing segments and company size, indutry type,and market coverage, but the results show a widespread intention of reducing the number of banks used. Finally, the implications of these results are discussed.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://ftp.econ.au.dk/afv/wp/99/02.PDF
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 File not found. If this is indeed the case, please notify ()
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus in its series Management Working Papers with number 1999-2.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:aah:aarmng:1999-2

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.au.dk/afv/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: single versus multiple sourcing; cash management; European corporate customers;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also covers the most complete directory of Economics departments and institutes, EDIRC.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.