This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

An Investigation of Tests for Linearity and the Accuracy of Flexible Nonlinear Inference

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Christian M. Dahl () (Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

A new approach recently suggested by Hamilton for flexible parametric inference in nonlinear models is examined through simulation studies. Hamilton suggests a new test for neglected nonlinearity and we compare it with the neural network test, Tsay's test, White's dynamic misspecification test, Ramsey's Reset test, the so-called V23 test, and the nonparametric BDS test. With respect to size and power properties, the results on the relative performance of Hamilton's test are very encouraging. In particular, we find that against almost all the nonlinear alternatives where the size and power properties of the popular neural network test are good the size and power properties of Hamilton's new test are even better. Secondly, we examine the convergence properties of Hamilton's estimator of the conditional mean function. Our finding suggest that in the case of a true linear relationship, the costs of using the flexible nonlinear approach in terms of efficiency and speed of convergence are minor. We also show that for many nonlinear models the percentage improvement in fit relative to the linear least squared estimator can be substantial. Finally, we present evidence showing that in finite samples the flexible regression approach suggested by Hamilton clearly outperforms the neural network regression approach in terms of accuracy.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://ftp.econ.au.dk/afn/wp/1999_8.ps
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 File not found. If this is indeed the case, please notify ()
File Format: application/postscript
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: ftp://ftp.econ.au.dk/afn/wp/1999_8.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 File not found. If this is indeed the case, please notify ()
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus in its series Economics Working Papers with number 1999-8.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 37
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:aah:aarhec:1999-8

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.au.dk/afn/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: Flexible nonlinear inference; tests for linearity; power and size comparison; convergence in small samples;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods
C20 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Adrian Pagan & Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "Econometric Analysis of Structural Systems with Permanent and Transitory Shocks. Working paper #7," NCER Working Paper Series 7, National Centre for Econometric Research. [Downloadable!]
  2. Rebeca Jiménez-Rodríguez, 2004. "Oil Price Shocks: Testing for Non-linearity," CSEF Working Papers 115, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy. [Downloadable!]
  3. James Hamilton, 1999. "A Parametric Approach to Flexible Nonlinear Inference," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 1999-03, Department of Economics, UC San Diego. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. D. Bond & M. Harrison & E.J. O'Brien, 2003. "Investigating Nonlinearity: A Note on the Implementation of Hamilton's Methodology," Trinity Economics Papers 200312, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. repec:tcd:wpaper:tep4 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Stan Hurn, 2004. "Testing for Nonlinearity in Mean in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 348, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. D. Bond & M.J. Harrision & E.J. O, Brien, 2005. "Investigating Nonlinearity: A Note on the Estimation of Hamilton’s Random Field Regression Model," Trinity Economics Papers tep4, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc stands for Research Papers in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-10.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.