The paper considers the task of selecting a flexible nonlinear model which can be used as a baseline model. The baseline model may be used as a testing ground for more structural models which are congruent with economic theory. From the limited empirical evidence obtained here it is tentatively suggested to find a baseline nonlinear flexible form for a univariate time series by following the procedure: 1. Recursively, based on h extra periods at a time specify and estimate a linear form by use of model selection criteria like Cross Validation and/or BIC. 2. After a preliminary test for linearity, recursively, specify and estimate flexible regression models like the FNL suggested by Hamilton (1999) and the Projection Pursuit model suggested by Aldrin, Boelviken and Schweder (1993) for cases of moderate nonlinearities. Use the Cross Validation and the BIC criteria. 3. Based on the remaining part of the data set select the best nonlinear flexible form by use of forecast criteria measuring the absolute forecast performance and the directional forecast performance in h-steps ahead predictions, and compare the best flexible form to the linear specification by use of the Diebold Mariano tests, see Deibold and Mariano (1995) and the forecast encompassing tests suggested by Harvey, Lebourne, and Newhold (1998). The results indicate that the FNL method and the Projection Pursuit Model are the preferable models to apply and that the CV and BIC are the best selection criteria, while the forecast encompassing tests properly modified as suggested by Harvey et. al. (1998) possess better power properties than the Diebold- Mariano test.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus in its series Economics Working Papers with number
1999-4.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - General C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: