Corruption and Religion. Adding to the Economic Model?
Abstract
The cross-country pattern in the 1998 corruption index from Transparency International is explained by a mixed economic-cultural model of corruption: (1) The economic model uses the level of real income per capita, the rate of inflation and the level of economic freedom. (2) The cultural model uses a set of variables giving the shares of 11 religions in each country, and the Herfindahl-index for religious diversity. The economic model explains the larger part of the variance, but the religions prove to have considerable additional explanatory power. The largest divide is within the Christians. By far the least corrupt are the Protestant and Anglicans, while Catholics, and other > Christians, deviate to the other side - as do Buddhists. Further, it is demon- strated that the more religiously divided a country, the less corrupt it is.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus in its series Economics Working Papers with number 1999-21.Length: 25
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:aah:aarhec:1999-21
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.au.dk/afn/
Related research
Keywords: Corruption; economic transition; religion;Other versions of this item:
- Paldam, Martin, 2001. "Corruption and Religion Adding to the Economic Model," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2-3), pages 383-413.
- K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other
- O11 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- P50 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2000-10-05 (All new papers)
- NEP-CDM-2000-10-05 (Collective Decision-Making)
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aah:aarhec:1999-21For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

