Martin Paldam () (Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Abstract
The 1998 corruption index from Transparency International is explained by two types of cross-country models: The economic model uses the level and growth of real income per capita, the rate of inflation and the amount of economic freedom. The cultural model uses a set of dummies for cultural areas and the level of democracy. It is demonstrated that both models work and have a strong interaction. The strongest factor reducing corruption is the transition from poor to rich. The (relative) difference between GDP-levels within the same cultural area is smaller than the (relative) difference between the levels of corruption, so the interaction points to something entirely different from culture, the inherent seesaw dynamics of corruption.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus in its series Economics Working Papers with number
1999-11.
Find related papers by JEL classification: K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other O11 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development P50 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)