Report NEP-EXP-2004-04-25

Subscribe to this report: email or RSS

Other reports in NEP-EXP

The following items were anounced in this report:

• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 2004. "The impact of defendant offers into court on negotiation in the shadow of the law: experimental evidence," ESE Discussion Papers 29, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh. [Downloadable!]
• Ed Hopkins, 2004. "Two Competing Models of How People Learn in Games," ESE Discussion Papers 51, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh. [Downloadable!]
• Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Timothy C. Salmon, 2004. "Bidder Preferences Among Auction Institutions," Experimental 0404005, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
• Jan Rouwendal & Arianne T. de Blaeij, 2004. "Inconsistent and Lexicographic Choices in Stated Preference Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-038/3, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
• John Bone & John Hey & John Suckling, . "A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment," Discussion Papers 00/36, Department of Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
• Michael Kosfeld & Arno Riedl, 2004. "The Design of (De)centralized Punishment Institutions for Sustaining Co-operation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-025/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 2004. "An experiment with two-way offers into court: restoring the balance in pre-trial negotiation," ESE Discussion Papers 28, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh. [Downloadable!]
• Brian G Main & Andrew Park, 2004. "Pre-trial settlement: Who's for two-way offers?," ESE Discussion Papers 50, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh. [Downloadable!]
• Eric Danan & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2004. "Are preferences incomplete? An experimental study using flexible choices," Discussion Papers on Strategic Interaction 2004-23, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group. [Downloadable!]

This page was last updated on 2008-10-12.