IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlfsa/87662.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Übersicht der Fallstudienregionen und ihre allgemeine Position im Standortwettbewerb

In: Städte und Regionen im Standortwettbewerb

Author

Listed:
  • Köller, Mareike

Abstract

Veränderungen im Standortwettbewerb betreffen Städte und Regionen weder gleichmäßig noch gleichgerichtet. Die in den nachfolgenden Beiträgen untersuchten Fallstudienregionen sind in ihrer wirtschaftlichen, sozialen und geographischen Situation zwar sehr unterschiedlich, nichtsdestotrotz stehen sie untereinander und mit anderen Regionen im Wettbewerb. Die untersuchten westdeutschen Städte mit Wachstumstendenzen und positiven Bevölkerungsentwicklungen (Hamburg, Bonn), ostdeutsche Städte mit dem problematischen Hintergrund des politischen und wirtschaftlichen Umbruchs (Berlin, Leipzig), eher ländlich geprägte Regionen mit spezifischen Besonderheiten (Bitburg-Prüm) sowie Regionen aus dem grenznahen Ausland (Linz, Kärnten, Bodensee-Region) müssen sich alle den verschiedenen Veränderungen in den letzten Dekaden stellen. In diesem Beitrag wird dafür zunächst ein Überblick über die allgemeine Situation der Fallstudienregionen im Standortwettbewerb und deren Entwicklungstendenzen gegeben.

Suggested Citation

  • Köller, Mareike, 2012. "Übersicht der Fallstudienregionen und ihre allgemeine Position im Standortwettbewerb," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Kauffmann, Albrecht & Rosenfeld, Martin T. W. (ed.), Städte und Regionen im Standortwettbewerb, volume 127, pages 124-141, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfsa:87662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/87662/1/771064918.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Huggins, 2010. "Regional Competitive Intelligence: Benchmarking and Policy-making," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 639-658.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rostek Katarzyna, 2013. "The Mutual Benchmarking Method for Smes’ Competitive Strategy Development," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Rafael Molinaro & Mohammad K. Najjar & Ahmed W. A. Hammad & Assed Haddad & Elaine Vazquez, 2020. "Urban Development Index (UDI): A Comparison between the City of Rio de Janeiro and Four Other Global Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2011. "Commentary," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(4), pages 773-780, April.
    4. Reggi, Luigi & Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, 2021. "Addressing territorial digital divides through ICT strategies: Are investment decisions consistent with local needs?," MPRA Paper 105003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2015. "In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 681-704, April.
    6. Castañeda, Gonzalo & Chávez-Juárez, Florian & Guerrero, Omar A., 2018. "How do governments determine policy priorities? Studying development strategies through spillover networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 335-361.
    7. Michele Acuto & Daniel Pejic & Jessie Briggs, 2021. "Taking City Rankings Seriously: Engaging with Benchmarking Practices in Global Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 363-377, March.
    8. Lozano Maya, Juan Roberto, 2013. "The United States experience as a reference of success for shale gas development: The case of Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 70-78.
    9. Massimo Baù & Francesco Chirico & Daniel Pittino & Mikaela Backman & Johan Klaesson, 2019. "Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 360-385, March.
    10. Pasimeni, Paolo, 2011. "Measuring Europe 2020: a new tool to assess the strategy," MPRA Paper 53508, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Mar 2012.
    11. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Mark Thissen & Thomas Graaff & Frank Oort, 2016. "Competitive network positions in trade and structural economic growth: A geographically weighted regression analysis for European regions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 159-180, March.
    12. Robert Huggins & Shougui Luo & Piers Thompson, 2014. "The competitiveness of China's Leading Regions: Benchmarking Their Knowledge-based Economies," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 241-267, July.
    13. Will Rossiter, 2017. "Prospects and Challenges for City Region Devolution in Nottingham and the East Midlands," NBS Discussion Papers in Economics 2017/05, Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfsa:87662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.