IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s6_34-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Personality Traits and Professional Responsibility – Preliminary Model

Author

Listed:
  • Radoslaw Macik

    (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland)

  • Dorota Macik

    (University of Finance and Management in Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose of this paper is analysis of connections between personality traits and effective functioning on different levels of professional responsibility. The main aim of this study was building a model which could explain in what way personality moderates coping with responsibility stress. Methodology: Two research questions were stated: What personality traits distinguish managers from other groups with personal responsibility of decision (with higher and lower level of responsibility); and: What stable personality and emotional control traits can predict effective professional functioning on different required levels of personal responsibility decision? Three groups of people (N=110), with different level of responsibility were exam: managers – characterised by middle level of personal responsibility, Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) – very high level of personal responsibility and representatives of different occupations with low level. Two questionnaires were used: to measure personality traits (Neo-Pi-R, Costa&McCrae) and emotional control (ECQ Brzezinski). Findings: Comparing of analysed groups shows many significant differences in four of the five big dimensions and specific traits. So, it is possibly to say, that probably only special types of persons can be effective as manager, like as ATC. Also, two path models were estimated. Initial model was poorly fitting the data, but the second one is characterized by very good fit indices. It shows, that some personality traits effect responsibility level directly, and in the highest way - Values. Excitability in general has negative influence on responsibility level. Value/oryginality: The main originality of this paper is comparing managers with ATC group as a specific kind of responsibility. This approach make possible to state conclusions about real role of special personality traits to be effective in coping with stress responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Radoslaw Macik & Dorota Macik, 2013. "Personality Traits and Professional Responsibility – Preliminary Model," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s6_34-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S6_34-50.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Berger & Chong Choi & Jai Kim, 2011. "Responsible Leadership for Multinational Enterprises in Bottom of Pyramid Countries: The Knowledge of Local Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 553-561, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Kulchina, 2016. "A path to value creation for foreign entrepreneurs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1240-1262, July.
    2. Berger, Ron & Silbiger, Avi & Herstein, Ram & Barnes, Bradley R., 2015. "Analyzing business-to-business relationships in an Arab context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 454-464.
    3. María Helena Jaén & Ezequiel Reficco & Gabriel Berger, 2021. "Does Integrity Matter in BOP Ventures? The Role of Responsible Leadership in Inclusive Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 467-488, October.
    4. Xinyue Zhang & Dian Li & Xintong Guo, 2022. "Antecedents of Responsible Leadership: Proactive and Passive Responsible Leadership Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Michailova, Snejina & Fee, Anthony & DeNisi, Angelo, 2023. "Research on host-country nationals in multinational enterprises: The last five decades and ways forward," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    6. Santos Nicholas J.C. & Laczniak Gene R., 2012. "Marketing to the Base of the Pyramid: A Corporate Responsibility Approach with Case Inspired Strategies," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-44, April.
    7. Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "What does it mean to be responsible? Addressing the missing responsibility dimension in ethical leadership research," Post-Print hal-01481471, HAL.
    8. Nicola M. Pless & Atri Sengupta & Melissa A. Wheeler & Thomas Maak, 2022. "Responsible Leadership and the Reflective CEO: Resolving Stakeholder Conflict by Imagining What Could be done," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 313-337, September.
    9. Elena Kulchina, 2017. "Do foreign entrepreneurs benefit their firms as managers?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1588-1607, August.
    10. Ernst Verwaal & Martin Klein & Jefferson Falce, 2022. "Business Model Involvement, Adaptive Capacity, and the Triple Bottom Line at the Base of the Pyramid," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 607-621, December.
    11. Aman, Sadaf & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Interestingly it's innovation: Reviewing sustainability performance management in the base of the pyramid (BoP)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Muhammad Arslan Nawaz & Asif Ali Khan & Usman Khalid & Andreas Buerkert & Martin Wiehle, 2019. "Superfruit in the Niche—Underutilized Sea Buckthorn in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Stephanie Schrage & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2021. "Addressing Governance Gaps in Global Value Chains: Introducing a Systematic Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 657-672, May.
    14. Raja Usman Khalid & Stefan Seuring, 2019. "Analyzing Base-of-the-Pyramid Research from a (Sustainable) Supply Chain Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 663-686, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s6_34-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.