IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s6_284-312.pdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Personal Values and Gift Giving: The Case of Choosing a Restaurant for Hosting Dinner

Author

Listed:
  • Peeraya Lekkumporn

    (Kasetsart University, Thailand)

Abstract

Learning on how people choosing a product or service remains an attractive topic for marketers for ages; nonetheless, how people utilize their cognitive structure when selecting products or services might be even more interesting. In this study, the cognitive structure of consumers was examined when choosing a restaurant for hosting dinner for their friends or family-members. Consumers’ cognitive structure in this study could be seen as the structure of Gift Giving Behaviour (GGB) because choosing a restaurant for others could be seen as gifting. From the literatures of GGB, the eight factors were achieved as the GGB structure: Attitude toward Behaviour (AB), Subjective Norm (SN), Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), Self-Identity toward Other (SIO), Self-Identity toward Self (SIS), Anticipated Emotion (AE), Purchase-Decision Involvement (PDI) and Symbolic of Gift (SG). Additionally, Personal Value (PV) which has been founded as an influencer for GGB also included in this study as the antecedent of GGB structure. Accordingly, this study aims to explain the relationship between Personal Value (PV) and Gift Giving Behaviour (GGB). Hosting a dinner for the closed relationship such as friend and family member is employed as a context for this study, so as to restrict GGB for intangible gift, occasional gifting, and with closed relationship. Kahle’s List of Value (LOV) was utilized as PVs construct such as Warm Relationship with Others (WR), Self Respect (SR), Self Fulfilment (SF), Sense of Accomplishment (SA), Fun and Enjoyment (FE), Sense of Belonging (SB), Being Well-Respected (BR), Security (SC), and Excitement (EC). Since GGB is one of voluntary behavior which directly related to Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), some criteria from TPB were in cooperated. Thus GGB construct consists of nine criteria which three factors were extracted from GGB such as Motivation of GGB (MG), Gift-Selection Effort (GE), Information Searching (IS) and six factors of TPB were included such as Attitude toward Behaviour (AB), Subjective Norm (SN), Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), Intensity of intention (II), Self-Identity (SI), and Anticipated Emotion (AE). The total of 638 respondents from web-based survey was captured in Australia. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was applied as a tool for analysis the data. Regard to the AMOS output, the final model of six PVs and eight GGB factors was accepted. The six PVs were Warm Relationship with Others (WR), Sense of Accomplishment (SA), Sense of Belonging (SB), Being Well-Respected (BR), Security (SC), and Excitement (EC). The eight factors of GGB construct were Attitude toward Behaviour (AB), Subjective Norm (SN), Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), Self-Identity toward Other (SIO), Self-Identity toward Self (SIS), Purchase-Decision Involvement (PDI) and Symbolic of Gift (SG).The results confirmed the previous study of Beatty, Kahle, and Homer in 1991 that the PVs has influence on GGB. Also it elaborated how each PVs affect differently on each factor of GGB construct. For example, people who held two PVs such as Warm Relationship to Others (WR) and Excitement (EC) as their primary PV tend to choose a gift utilizing Attitude toward Behaviour (AB) more than the others. This study contributes to both theoretical and managerial perspectives. The relationship of each PVs and each factor of GGB was drawn. As well as the GGB construct was proposed. For marketing managers, the PV-based segmentation could be used for better understanding customers and planning marketing strategy in gift market.

Suggested Citation

  • Peeraya Lekkumporn, 2013. "Personal Values and Gift Giving: The Case of Choosing a Restaurant for Hosting Dinner," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
  • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s6_284-312.pdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S6_284-312.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laroche, Michel & Cleveland, Mark & Browne, Elizabeth, 2004. "Exploring age-related differences in information acquisition for a gift purchase," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 61-95, February.
    2. Beatty, Sharon E. & Kahle, Lynn R. & Homer, Pamela, 1991. "Personal values and gift-giving behaviors: A study across cultures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 149-157, March.
    3. Fischer, Eileen & Arnold, Stephen J, 1990. "More than a Labor of Love: Gender Roles and Christmas Gift Shopping," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(3), pages 333-345, December.
    4. Otnes, Cele & Lowrey, Tina M & Kim, Young Chan, 1993. "Gift Selection for Easy and Difficult Recipients: A Social Roles Interpretation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 229-244, September.
    5. Kahle, Lynn R & Beatty, Sharon E & Homer, Pamela, 1986. "Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Style (VALS)," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 405-409, December.
    6. Belk, Russell W, 1976. "It's the Thought That Counts: A Signed Digraph Analysis of Gift-Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 3(3), pages 155-162, December.
    7. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.
    2. Vanhamme, J. & de Bont, C.J.P.M., 2005. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases of Small Electric Appliances: A Pilot Study," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-081-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Laura Birg & Anna Goeddeke, 2016. "Christmas Economics—A Sleigh Ride," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(4), pages 1980-1984, October.
    4. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    5. Guido, Gianluigi & Pino, Giovanni & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2016. "Assessing individuals' re-gifting motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5956-5963.
    6. Ye Yang & Angela Paladino, 2015. "The case of wine: understanding Chinese gift-giving behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 335-361, September.
    7. Nguyen, Hieu P. & Munch, James M., 2011. "Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 113-118, February.
    8. Cavanaugh, Lisa A. & Gino, Francesca & Fitzsimons, Gavan J., 2015. "When doing good is bad in gift giving: Mis-predicting appreciation of socially responsible gifts," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 178-189.
    9. Ertimur, Burçak & Muñoz, Caroline & Hutton, James G., 2015. "Regifting: A multi-perspective processual overview," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1997-2004.
    10. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep & Tripathi, Arvind K., 2009. "Monetary donations to an open source software platform," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 404-414, March.
    11. Georg Muller & Mark Bergen & Shantanu Dutta & Daniel Levy, 2006. "Private label price rigidity during holiday periods," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 57-62.
    12. Gao, Hailian & Huang, Songshan (Sam) & Brown, Graham, 2017. "The influence of face on Chinese tourists’ gift purchase behaviour: The moderating role of the gift giver–receiver relationship," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 97-106.
    13. Reshadi, Farnoush, 2023. "Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Schiffman, Leon G. & Cohn, Deborah Y., 2009. "Are they playing by the same rules? A consumer gifting classification of marital dyads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1054-1062, November.
    15. Givi, Julian, 2020. "(Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 87-98.
    16. Givi, Julian, 2021. "When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 393-405.
    17. Luo, Biao & Fang, Wenpei & Shen, Jie & Cong, Xue Fei, 2019. "Gift–image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-152.
    18. Park, Yookyung & Yi, Youjae, 2022. "Is a gift on sale “heart-discounted†? Givers’ misprediction on the value of discounted gifts and the influence of service robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Dave Webb & Janine Wong, 2014. "Exploring Antecedents of Charitable Giving and Their Impact on Subjective Well-Being in Singapore," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 65-87, May.
    20. de Hooge, Ilona E., 2014. "Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 380-394.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s6_284-312.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.