IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spochp/978-3-319-69215-9_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Impact of Bunker Risk Management on CO2 Emissions in Maritime Transportation Under ECA Regulation

In: Sustainable Logistics and Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Yewen Gu

    (Norwegian School of Economics)

  • Stein W. Wallace

    (Norwegian School of Economics)

  • Xin Wang

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

The shipping industry carries over 90% of the world’s trade, and is hence a major contributor to CO2 and other airborne emissions. As a global effort to reduce air pollution from ships, the implementation of the ECA (Emission Control Areas) regulations has given rise to the wide usage of cleaner fuels. This has led to an increased emphasis on the management and risk control of maritime bunker costs for many shipping companies. In this paper, we provide a novel view on the relationship between bunker risk management and CO2 emissions. In particular, we investigate how different actions taken in bunker risk management, based on different risk aversions and fuel hedging strategies, impact a shipping company’s CO2 emissions. We use a stochastic programming model and perform various comparison tests in a case study based on a major liner company. Our results show that a shipping company’s risk attitude on bunker costs has impacts on its CO2 emissions. We also demonstrate that, by properly designing its hedging strategies, a shipping company can sometimes achieve noticeable CO2 reduction with little financial sacrifice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yewen Gu & Stein W. Wallace & Xin Wang, 2017. "The Impact of Bunker Risk Management on CO2 Emissions in Maritime Transportation Under ECA Regulation," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Didem Cinar & Konstantinos Gakis & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Sustainable Logistics and Transportation, pages 199-224, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-319-69215-9_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69215-9_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindstad, Haakon & Asbjørnslett, Bjørn E. & Strømman, Anders H., 2011. "Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3456-3464, June.
    2. Gu, Yewen & Wallace, Stein W. & Wang, Xin, 2016. "Integrated maritime bunker management with stochastic fuel prices and new emission regulations," Discussion Papers 2016/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    3. Amir Alizadeh & Manolis Kavussanos & David Menachof, 2004. "Hedging against bunker price fluctuations using petroleum futures contracts: constant versus time-varying hedge ratios," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 1337-1353.
    4. Mr. Noureddine Krichene, 2008. "Crude Oil Prices: Trends and Forecast," IMF Working Papers 2008/133, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Pedrielli, Giulia & Lee, Loo Hay & Ng, Szu Hui, 2015. "Optimal bunkering contract in a buyer–seller supply chain under price and consumption uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 77-94.
    6. Michael Maloni & Jomon Aliyas Paul & David M Gligor, 2013. "Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(2), pages 151-171, June.
    7. Qi, Xiangtong & Song, Dong-Ping, 2012. "Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 863-880.
    8. Wong, Eugene Y.C. & Tai, Allen H. & Lau, Henry Y.K. & Raman, Mardjuki, 2015. "An utility-based decision support sustainability model in slow steaming maritime operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 57-69.
    9. Xiaoyu Wang & Chee-Chong Teo, 2013. "Integrated hedging and network planning for container shipping's bunker fuel management," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(2), pages 172-196, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tzeu-Chen Han & Chih-Min Wang, 2021. "Shipping Bunker Cost Risk Assessment and Management during the Coronavirus Oil Shock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Yewen & Wallace, Stein W. & Wang, Xin, 2016. "Integrated maritime bunker management with stochastic fuel prices and new emission regulations," Discussion Papers 2016/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    2. Maxim A. Dulebenets & Junayed Pasha & Olumide F. Abioye & Masoud Kavoosi, 2021. "Vessel scheduling in liner shipping: a critical literature review and future research needs," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 43-106, March.
    3. Mallidis, Ioannis & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Dekker, Rommert & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2018. "The impact of slow steaming on the carriers’ and shippers’ costs: The case of a global logistics network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-39.
    4. Tran, Nguyen Khoi & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2015. "An empirical study of fleet expansion and growth of ship size in container liner shipping," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 241-253.
    5. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Aydin, N. & Lee, H. & Mansouri, S.A., 2017. "Speed optimization and bunkering in liner shipping in the presence of uncertain service times and time windows at ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 143-154.
    7. Hui-Huang Tai & Yun-Hua Chang, 2022. "Reducing pollutant emissions from vessel maneuvering in port areas," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 651-671, September.
    8. Alexandridis, George & Kavussanos, Manolis G. & Kim, Chi Y. & Tsouknidis, Dimitris A. & Visvikis, Ilias D., 2018. "A survey of shipping finance research: Setting the future research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-212.
    9. Xi Jiang & Haijun Mao & Yadong Wang & Hao Zhang, 2020. "Liner Shipping Schedule Design for Near-Sea Routes Considering Big Customers’ Preferences on Ship Arrival Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Yuzhe Zhao & Yujun Fan & Jingmiao Zhou & Haibo Kuang, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization of Vessel Speed and Route for Sustainable Coastal Shipping under the Regulations of Emission Control Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Riccardo Giusti & Daniele Manerba & Roberto Tadei, 2021. "Smart Steaming: A New Flexible Paradigm for Synchromodal Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Lee, Habin & Aluko, Oluwakayode, 2015. "Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: A review and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 3-18.
    13. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Shuaian & Zhuge, Dan, 2017. "Dynamic programming for optimal ship refueling decision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 63-74.
    15. Wong, Eugene Y.C. & Tai, Allen H. & Lau, Henry Y.K. & Raman, Mardjuki, 2015. "An utility-based decision support sustainability model in slow steaming maritime operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 57-69.
    16. Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Xinchang, 2016. "A polynomial-time algorithm for sailing speed optimization with containership resource sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 394-405.
    17. Jiawei Ge & Mo Zhu & Mei Sha & Theo Notteboom & Wenming Shi & Xuefeng Wang, 2021. "Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 587-614, December.
    18. Finnsgård, Christian & Kalantari, Joakim & Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan, 2020. "The Shipper's perspective on slow steaming - Study of Six Swedish companies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 44-49.
    19. Dan Zhuge & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen & Gilbert Laporte, 2020. "Schedule design for liner services under vessel speed reduction incentive programs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(1), pages 45-62, February.
    20. Xu Zhao & Qianjun Lin & Hao Yu, 2019. "An Improved Mathematical Model for Green Lock Scheduling Problem of the Three Gorges Dam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shipping Company; Conditional Value At Risk (CVaR); CVaR Constraints; Risk-averse Setting; Hedging Decisions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-319-69215-9_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.