The self government’s asset, incomes and its management, the resources of the areal-development-region –the separate regulation of the two regional unit- part II. The possibilities of the reform
In: Proceedings of FIKUSZ '09
AbstractThe reform process of public administration have to be continued on the basis of the regionsystem – and the two structures have to exist together and cooperate with each other. Regional self-governments and counties can exist in line with each other. The basic tasks and authorities of regional self-governments has to be declared in the Constitution. Regional self-governments have to possess the legislative authority, which would be similar to the county selfgovernment’s competence, which would be similar to the county self-government’s decreeconstitutional competence. Political basis is needed to it at local, county and national levels. The regulation has to consider, that the modern european regionalization was directed by the ethnic-historical reasons, but also the intetion to balance the economic inequalities. The territorial and economic development have to indicate the main line of the hungarian region’s activity. The county level would not mean self-governance any more –but the institutions of the territorial development has to be established also at the county level. The established and direct elected regional self-governments would take over development tasks from the central government, from government offices and from de-concentrated organs, breaking the practice, in which the working out of programmes and the distribution of development resources depend on the central state-apparatus.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
This chapter was published in: László Áron Kóczy (ed.) Proceedings of FIKUSZ '09, , pages 129-138, 2009.
This item is provided by Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management in its series Proceedings of FIKUSZ '09 with number 129-138.
sources of the ”mid-level”; constitutional regulation; reform proposals; management’s revision; county level vs. regional self-governments;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alexandra Vécsey).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.