Estimates and implications of the costs of compliance with biosafety regulations for African agriculture
In: Genetically modified crops in Africa: Economic and policy lessons from countries south of the Sahara
AbstractModern biotechnology needs to be a part of the tools used for effective povÂ¬erty alleviation in Africa. As GE crops and other products are regulated products, it is imperative to establish regulatory systems that are commenÂ¬surate with the potential risk of the technology. These systems should be not only flexible enough to adapt to gains in knowledge and experience, but also transparent and fair, and take into consideration all aspects of a broad and inclusive decisionmaking process. Biosafety systems that are too cumÂ¬bersome or inflexible and those that become an insurmountable hurdle will stop this technology in its tracks, even those that have an elevated potential to resolve specific productivity issues of African agriculture. Biosafety thus becomes a process that considers all costs, benefits, and risks of prospective technologies within the scope of overall sustainable agricultural and ecoÂ¬nomic development.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
This chapter was published in:
This item is provided by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in its series IFPRI book chapters with number 9780896297951-06.
Africa south of Sahara; Africa; biotechnology; Transgenic plants; Risk assessment; Economic aspects; Biosafety regulations; Biotechnological safety; socioeconomic development; Genetically engineered organisms; Genetically modified foods; Data collection; genetic heterogeneity; ex-ante impact assessment; Ex-post impact assessment; Developing countries; bt cotton; maize; banana; Agricultural research;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Morgenstern, Richard & Harrington, Winston & Nelson, Per-Kristian, 1999. "On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates," Discussion Papers dp-99-18, Resources For the Future.
- Odhiambo, Benjamin & Bergvinson, David & Mugo, Stephen & De Groote, Hugo, 2004. "Debunking The Myths Of Gm Crops For Africa: The Case Of Bt Maize In Kenya," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Yorobe, Jose M., Jr. & Manalo, Abraham & Ramon, Godfrey & Amirsuhin, Bahagiawati & Lokollo, Erna M. & Zambrano, Patricia, 2007. "The Cost of Compliance with Biosafety Regulations in Indonesia and The Philippines," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 9947, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Smale, Melinda & Zambrano, Patricia & Gruère, Guillaume & Falck-Zepeda, José & Matuschke, Ira & Horna, Daniela & Nagarajan, Latha & Yerramareddy, Indira & Jones, Hannah, 2009. "Measuring the economic impacts of transgenic crops in developing agriculture during the first decade: Approaches, findings, and future directions," Food policy reviews 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Fiedler, John L. & Kilkuwe, Enoch M. & Birol, Ekin, 2013. "An ex ante analysis of the impact and cost-effectiveness of biofortified high-provitamin A and high-iron banana in Uganda:," IFPRI discussion papers 1277, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.