This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations of
Ana Isabel Saracho

For current contact information and a more complete listing of works, please see here

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Access and download statistics

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Ana I. Saracho, 2002. "Patent Licensing Under Strategic Delegation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 225-251, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Ramón Faulí-Oller & Joel Sandonís, 2007. "Patent Licensing By Means Of An Auction: Internal Vs. External Patentee," Working Papers. Serie AD 2007-09, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    2. Judy Hsu & X. Henry Wang, 2004. "On the Licensing of Innovations under Strategic Delegation," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 12(6), pages 1-10. [Downloadable!]
    3. Stephen Law, 2004. "Inter-temporal Tie-ins: A Case for Tying Intellectual Property Through Licensing," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 3-26, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Robert A. Ritz, 2008. "Cost pass-through under delegation," Economics Series Working Papers 404, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    5. Giorgos Stamatopoulos, 2008. "On the possibility of licensing in a market with logit demand functions," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 4(17), pages 1-11. [Downloadable!]
    6. X. Henry Wang & Bill Yang, 2004. "On Technology Transfer to an Asymmetric Cournot Duopoly," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 4(14), pages 1-6. [Downloadable!]
    7. Ramón Faulí-Oller & Joel Sandonís, 2003. "Merging To License: Internal Vs. External Patentee," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-17, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]

  2. Saracho, Ana I., 1997. "The diffusion of a durable embodied capital innovation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 45-50, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. José M. Usategui, 2006. "Non-Stationary Demand in a Durable Goods Monopoly," DFAEII Working Papers 200605, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II, revised 11 Jan 2008. [Downloadable!]
    2. Jose Maria Usategui, 2001. "Commitment Power in a Non-Stationary Durable-Good Market," BILTOKI 200108, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística). [Downloadable!]

  3. Saracho, Ana Isabel & Usategui, JoseMaria, 1994. "Innovation diffusion subsidies: Supply without precommitment ability and welfare," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 357-372, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Ioulia Ossokina & Otto Swank, 2008. "Adoption Subsidy Versus Technology Standards Under Asymmetric Information," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 241-267, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Did you know? All the bibliographic data shown here has been contributed by volunteers, thereby helping to keep this service free.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-27.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.