This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations of
Bipasa Datta

For current contact information and a more complete listing of works, please see here

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Access and download statistics

Working papers

  1. Datta, Bipasa & Dixon, Huw, 2002. "Technological Change, Entry and Stock Market Dynamics: An Analysis of Transition in a Monopolistic Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Rui Mazeda Gil & Paulo Brito & Óscar Afonso, 2008. "A Model of Quality Ladders with Horizontal Entry," FEP Working Papers 296, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto. [Downloadable!]


Articles

  1. Bipasa Datta & Huw Dixon, 2002. "Technological Change, Entry, and Stock-Market Dynamics: An Analysis of Transition in a Monopolistic Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 231-235, May. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Costa, Luís F. & Dixon, Huw, 2007. "A Simple Business-Cycle Model with Shumpeterian Features," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2007/28, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  2. Datta, Bipasa & Dixon, Huw, 2001. "Omega-Homothetic Preferences: Theory and Applications," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 48(2), pages 148-63, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Monica Correa Lopez, 2003. "Extended linear-homothetic preferences and the Cournot-Bertrand profit differential," Economics Discussion Papers 569, University of Essex, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    2. M. Correa-López, 2006. "A model of unionized oligopoly in general equilibrium," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0605, Economics, The University of Manchester. [Downloadable!]

  3. Datta, Bipasa & Dixon, Huw, 2000. "Linear-homothetic preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 55-61, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Conniffe, D., 2002. "Sums and Products of Indirect Utility Functions," Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series n1150402, Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland - Maynooth. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Bipasa Datta & Huw D. Dixon, . "omega - Homothetic Preferences," Discussion Papers 00/19, Department of Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
    3. M. Correa Lopez, 2004. "Macroeconomic Effects of Oligopolistic Competition with Wage Bargaining," Economics Discussion Papers 577, University of Essex, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    4. Monica Correa Lopez, 2003. "Extended linear-homothetic preferences and the Cournot-Bertrand profit differential," Economics Discussion Papers 569, University of Essex, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    5. Denis Conniffe, 2002. "Sums and Products of Indirect Utility Functions," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 285-295. [Downloadable!]
    6. M. Correa-López, 2006. "A model of unionized oligopoly in general equilibrium," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0605, Economics, The University of Manchester. [Downloadable!]


Did you know? RePEc stands for Research Papers in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.