Citations of
Luc Lauwers

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Access and download statistics

Working papers

1. Luc LAUWERS, 2009. "Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces09.05, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]

   Cited by:

   1. Geir B, ASHEIM & Claude, DÕASPREMONT & Kuntal, BANERJEE, 2008. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2008044, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Geir B. Asheim & Claude d’Aspremont & Kuntal Banerjee, 2008. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," Working Papers 08004, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University. [Downloadable!]
      • Geir B. , ASHEIM & Claude, DASPREMONT & Kuntal, BANERJEE, 2008. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2008039, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
      • ASHEIM, Geir B. & dÕASPREMONT, Claude & BANERJEE, Kuntal, 2008. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," CORE Discussion Papers 2008065, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
      • Asheim, Geir B. & d'Aspremont, Claude & Banerjee, Kuntal, 2008. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 394, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University. [Downloadable!]
   2. Chiaki Hara & Tomoichi Shinotsuka & Kotaro Suzumura & Yongsheng Xu, 2008. "Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 179-191, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   3. Kohei Kamaga & Takashi Kojima, 2009. " $${\mathcal{Q}}$$ -anonymous social welfare relations on infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 405-413, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   4. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee, 2009. "Fixed-step anonymous overtaking and catching-up," Working Papers 09001, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University. [Downloadable!]
   5. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2009. "On the extension of a preorder under translation invariance," MPRA Paper 15407, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]

2. Kristof Bosmans & Luc Lauwers, 2007. "Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces0705, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]

   Cited by:

   1. Karagozoglu, Emin, 2008. "Distributive Concerns in the Bankruptcy Problem with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memoranda 032, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]
   2. José M. Jiménez Gómez & María del Carmen Marco, 2008. "A New Approach for Bounding Awards in Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]

3. T. Demuynck & L. Lauwers, 2005. "Nash rationalizability of collective choice over lotteries," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/301, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]

   Cited by:

   1. Jose Penalva & Michael D. Ryall, 2008. "Empirical Implications of Information Structure in Finite Extensive Form Games," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 8(1). [Downloadable!]

4. László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2001. "The Coalition Structure Core is Accessible," Game Theory and Information 0110001, EconWPA, revised 26 Jun 2002. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2002. "The Coalition Structure Core is Accessible," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces0219, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]
   
   Published as:
   • Koczy, Laszlo A. & Lauwers, Luc, 2004. "The coalition structure core is accessible," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 86-93, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. Kóczy,László Á., 2005. "The Core Can Be Accessed with a Bounded Number of Blocks," Research Memoranda 042, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Koczy, Laszlo A., 2006. "The core can be accessed with a bounded number of blocks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 56-64, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      • Laszlo.A.Koczy, 2005. "The Core Can Be Accessed with a Bounded Number of Blocks," IEHAS Discussion Papers 0512, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. [Downloadable!]
   2. Kóczy,László Á. & Lauwers,Luc, 2004. "The minimal dominant set is a non-empty core-extension," Research Memoranda 018, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2003. "The Minimal Dominant Set is a Non-Empty Core-Extension," Working Papers 2003.50, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
      • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2002. "The Minimal Dominant Set is a Non-Empty Core-Extension," Game Theory and Information 0210002, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
      • Koczy, Laszlo A. & Lauwers, Luc, 2007. "The minimal dominant set is a non-empty core-extension," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 277-298, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      • Laszlo A. Koczy & Luc Lauwers, 2004. "The minimal dominant set is a non-empty core-extension," IEHAS Discussion Papers 0421, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. [Downloadable!]
      • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2002. "The Minimal Dominant Set is a Non-Empty Core-Extension," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces0220, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]
   3. Gabrielle Demange, 2006. "The strategy structure of some coalition formation games," PSE Working Papers 2006-38, PSE (Ecole normale supérieure). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Demange, Gabrielle, 2009. "The strategy structure of some coalition formation games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 83-104, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

5. Luc Lauwers, 1999. "Topological Social Choice," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces9912, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]
   Published as:
   • Lauwers, Luc, 2000. "Topological social choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-39, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological proof of Eliaz's unified theorem of social choice theory (forthcoming in "Applied Mathematics and Computation")," Public Economics 0510021, EconWPA, revised 26 Oct 2005. [Downloadable!]
   2. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2006. "Allais-anonymity as an alternative to the discounted-sum criterion in the calculus of optimal growth I: Consensual optimality," MPRA Paper 10512, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
   3. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders (forcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Compuation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506013, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005. [Downloadable!]
   4. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "On the equivalence of the Arrow impossibility theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem (forthcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Computation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506012, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005. [Downloadable!]
   5. Pivato, Marcus, 2008. "Sustainable preferences via nondiscounted, hyperreal intergenerational welfare functions," MPRA Paper 7461, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
   6. Kari Saukkonen, 2007. "Continuity of social choice functions with restricted coalition algebras," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 637-647, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   7. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6. [Downloadable!]
   8. Luc Lauwers, 2009. "The topological approach to the aggregation of preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 449-476, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

1. Demuynck, Thomas & Lauwers, Luc, 2009. "Nash rationalization of collective choice over lotteries," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 1-15, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. T. Demuynck, 2009. "Common ordering extensions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/593, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]

2. Erwin Ooghe & Luc Lauwers, 2005. "Non-dictatorial extensive social choice," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 721-743, 04. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. E. Ooghe & E. Schokkaert & D. Van De Gaer, 2004. "Equality of opportunity versus equality of opportunity sets," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/240, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Erwin Ooghe & Erik Schokkaert & Dirk Van de Gaer, 2003. "Equality of opportunity versus equality of opportunity sets," Public Economics Working Paper Series wpeoeos, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Working Group Public Economics. [Downloadable!]
      • Erwin Ooghe & Erik Schokkaert & Dirk gaer, 2007. "Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 209-230, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

3. Luc Lauwers, 2004. "Topological manipulators form an ultrafilter," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 437-445, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological proof of Eliaz's unified theorem of social choice theory (forthcoming in "Applied Mathematics and Computation")," Public Economics 0510021, EconWPA, revised 26 Oct 2005. [Downloadable!]
   2. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders (forcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Compuation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506013, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005. [Downloadable!]
   3. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "On the equivalence of the Arrow impossibility theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem (forthcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Computation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506012, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005. [Downloadable!]

4. Koczy, Laszlo A. & Lauwers, Luc, 2004. "The coalition structure core is accessible," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 86-93, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2002. "The Coalition Structure Core is Accessible," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces0219, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]
   • László Á. Kóczy & Luc Lauwers, 2001. "The Coalition Structure Core is Accessible," Game Theory and Information 0110001, EconWPA, revised 26 Jun 2002. [Downloadable!]

   See citations under working paper version above.

5. Lauwers, Luc, 2000. "Topological social choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-39, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Luc Lauwers, 1999. "Topological Social Choice," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces9912, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën. [Downloadable!]

   See citations under working paper version above.

6. Lauwers, Luc, 1998. "Intertemporal objective functions: Strong pareto versus anonymity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 37-55, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. dÕASPREMONT, Claude, 2005. "Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity," CORE Discussion Papers 2005075, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Claude, dÕASPREMONT, 2005. "Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2005051, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
   2. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2006. "Allais-anonymity as an alternative to the discounted-sum criterion in the calculus of optimal growth I: Consensual optimality," MPRA Paper 10512, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
   3. Juan A. Crespo & Carmelo Núñez & Juan Pablo Rincón-Zapatero, 2007. "On the impossibility of representing infinite utility streams," Economics Working Papers we075530, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Juan Crespo & Carmelo Nuñez & Juan Rincón-Zapatero, 2009. "On the impossibility of representing infinite utility streams," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 47-56, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   4. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2008. "Translation invariance when utility streams are infinite and unbounded," MPRA Paper 18523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Oct 2009. [Downloadable!]
   5. Mohamed Mabrouk, 2005. "Intergenerational anonymity as an alternative to the discounted- sum criterion in the calculus of optimal growth II: Pareto optimality and some economic interpretations," GE, Growth, Math methods 0511007, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
   6. Mohamed Mabrouk, 2005. "Intergenerational anonymity as an alternative to the discounted- sum criterion in the calculus of optimal growth I: Consensual optimality," GE, Growth, Math methods 0510013, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
   7. Basu, Kaushik & Mitra, Tapan, 2005. "On the Existence of Paretian Social Welfare Relations for Infinite Utility Streams with Extended Anonymity," Working Papers 05-06, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. [Downloadable!]
   8. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2009. "A comment on "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf"," MPRA Paper 14763, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
   9. Mabrouk, Mohamed B.R., 2008. "Translation invariance when utility streams are infinite and unbounded," MPRA Paper 17664, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Oct 2009. [Downloadable!]

7. Luc Lauwers, 1997. "Continuity and equity with infinite horizons," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 345-356. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. Toyotaka Sakai, 2006. "Equitable Intergenerational Preferences on Restricted Domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 41-54, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   2. Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "Intergenerational preferences and sensitivity to the present," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 4(26), pages 1-5. [Downloadable!]
   3. Chiaki Hara & Tomoichi Shinotsuka & Kotaro Suzumura & Yongsheng Xu, 2008. "Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 179-191, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   4. Christopher Chambers, 2009. "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 243-252, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   5. Asheim,G.B. & Buchholz,W. & Tungodden,B., 1999. "Justifying sustainability," Memorandum 08/1999, Oslo University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Asheim, G.B. & Buchholz, W. & Tungodden, B., 1999. "Justifying Sustainability," Papers 5/99, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration-.
      • Asheim, Geir B. & Buchholz, Wolfgang & Tungodden, Bertil, 2001. "Justifying Sustainability," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 252-268, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   6. Banerjee, Kuntal & Mitra, Tapan, 2004. "On the Continuity of Ethical Social Welfare Orders," Working Papers 04-16, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. [Downloadable!]

8. Luc Lauwers, 1997. "Topological aggregation, the case of an infinite population," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 319-332. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

   Cited by:

   1. Andrei Gomberg & Cesar Martinelli & Ricard Torres, 2002. "Anonymity in Large Societies," Working Papers 0211, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Andrei Gomberg & César Martinelli & Ricard Torres, 2005. "Anonymity in large societies," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 187-205, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

9. Luc Lauwers, 1996. "Rawlsian equity and generalised utilitarianism with an infinite population (*)," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 143-150.

   Cited by:

   1. Christopher Chambers, 2009. "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 243-252, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   2. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee, 2009. "Fixed-step anonymous overtaking and catching-up," Working Papers 09001, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University. [Downloadable!]
   3. Basu, Kaushik & Mitra, Tapan, 2005. "On the Existence of Paretian Social Welfare Relations for Infinite Utility Streams with Extended Anonymity," Working Papers 05-06, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. [Downloadable!]
   4. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2009. "A comment on "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf"," MPRA Paper 14763, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
   5. Basu, Kaushik & Mitra, Tapan, 2003. "Utilitarianism for Infinite Utility Streams: A New Welfare Criterion and Its Axiomatic Characterization," Working Papers 03-05, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
      • Basu, Kaushik & Mitra, Tapan, 2007. "Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: A new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 350-373, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

10. Lauwers, Luc & Van Liedekerke, Luc, 1995. "Ultraproducts and aggregation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 217-237. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. dÕASPREMONT, Claude, 2005. "Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity," CORE Discussion Papers 2005075, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
       Other versions:
       • Claude, dÕASPREMONT, 2005. "Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2005051, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
    2. Frederik Herzberg, 2008. "Judgment aggregation functions and ultraproducts," Working Papers 405, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]
       Other versions:
       • Herzberg, Frederik S., 2008. "Judgement aggregation functions and ultraproducts," MPRA Paper 10546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2008. [Downloadable!]
    3. H. Reiju Mihara, 1996. "Existence of a Coalitionally Strategyproof Social Choice Function: A Constructive Proof," Public Economics 9604002, EconWPA, revised 20 Sep 1996. [Downloadable!]
       Other versions:
       • H. Reiju Mihara, 2001. "Existence of a coalitionally strategyproof social choice function: A constructive proof," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 543-553. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Norbert Brunner & H. Reiju Mihara, 1999. "Arrow's theorem, Weglorz' models and the axiom of choice," Public Economics 9902001, EconWPA, revised 01 Jun 2004. [Downloadable!]
    5. H. Reiju Mihara, 1997. "Arrow's Theorem, countably many agents, and more visible invisible dictators," Public Economics 9705001, EconWPA, revised 07 May 1997. [Downloadable!]
       Other versions:
       • Mihara, H. Reiju, 1999. "Arrow's theorem, countably many agents, and more visible invisible dictators1," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 267-287, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    6. Pivato, Marcus, 2008. "Sustainable preferences via nondiscounted, hyperreal intergenerational welfare functions," MPRA Paper 7461, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    7. Frederik Herzberg, 2009. "A representative individual from Arrovian aggregation of parametric individual utilities," Working Papers 411, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]

11. Lauwers, Luc, 1995. "Time-neutrality and linearity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 347-351. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Basu, Kaushik & Mitra, Tapan, 2005. "On the Existence of Paretian Social Welfare Relations for Infinite Utility Streams with Extended Anonymity," Working Papers 05-06, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. [Downloadable!]

12. Lauwers, Luc, 1993. "Infinite Chichilnisky rules," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 349-352. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Graciela Chichilnisky, 2009. "Avoiding Extinction: Equal Treatment of the Present and the Future," Working Papers 09-07, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Aug 2009. [Downloadable!]
       Other versions:
       • Chichilnisky, Graciela, 2009. "Avoiding extinction: equal treatment of the present and the future," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 3(32), pages 1-25. [Downloadable!]
       • Chichilnisky, Graciela, 2009. "Avoiding Extinction: Equal Treatment of the Present and the Future," Economics Discussion Papers 2009-8, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. [Downloadable!]
    2. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1996. "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 231-257, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
       Other versions:
       • Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1995. "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development," MPRA Paper 8609, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    3. Andrea Beltratti & Graciela Chichilnisky & Geoffrey Heal, 1993. "Sustainable Growth and the Green Golden Rule," NBER Working Papers 4430, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Pivato, Marcus, 2008. "Sustainable preferences via nondiscounted, hyperreal intergenerational welfare functions," MPRA Paper 7461, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]

This page was last updated on 2009-12-21.