This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations of
Jeroen Hinloopen

For current contact information and a more complete listing of works, please see here

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Books | Access and download statistics

Working papers

  1. Jeroen Hinloopen & Adriaan Soetevent, 2006. "Trust and Recidivism; the Partial Success of Corporate Leniency Program in the Laboratory," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 06-067/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2005. "The Pro-collusive Effect of Increasing the Repose Period for Price Fixing Agreements," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-104/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    2. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2007. "The Pro-collusive Effect of Increasing the Repose Period for Price Fixing Agreements," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 7(1). [Downloadable!]

  2. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2006. "Comparative Advantage, the Rank-size Rule, and Zipf's Law," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 06-100/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Harry P. Bowen & Haris Munandar & Jean-Marie Viaene, 2009. "How Integrated Is The World Economy?," Discussion Paper Series 2009-03, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte. [Downloadable!]
    2. Jan Loecker & Jozef Konings & Patrick Cayseele, 2008. "Merger Review: How Much of Industry is Affected in an International Perspective?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:

  3. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2005. "Empirical Relevance of the Hillman Condition for Revealed Comparative Advantage: 10 Stylized Facts," Working Papers 05-24, Utrecht School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Möllers, Judith & Zier, Patrick & Frohberg, Klaus & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Bojnec, Stefan, 2009. "Croatia's EU Accession: Socio-economic Assessment of Farm Households and Policy Recommendations," MPRA Paper 17365, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Jessie Bakens & Henri de Groot, 2007. "Globalisation and the Dutch Economy," CPB Discussion Papers 89, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. [Downloadable!]

  4. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2004. "Dynamics of Chinese Comparative Advantage," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-034/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Amador, João & Cabral, Sónia & Ramos Maria, José, 2007. "International Trade Patterns over the Last Four Decades: How does Portugal Compare with other Cohesion Countries?," MPRA Paper 5996, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    2. Jessie Bakens & Henri de Groot, 2007. "Globalisation and the Dutch Economy," CPB Discussion Papers 89, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. [Downloadable!]
    3. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2005. "Empirical Relevance of the Hillman Condition for Revealed Comparative Advantage: 10 Stylized Facts," Working Papers 05-24, Utrecht School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Wim Suyker & Henri de Groot, 2006. "China and the Dutch Economy, Stylised facts and prospects," CPB Documents 127, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. [Downloadable!]
    5. Amador, João & Cabral, Sonia & Ramos Maria, Jose, 2007. "Relative Export Structures and Vertical Specialization: A Simple Cross-Country Index," MPRA Paper 6208, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]

  5. J. Hinloopen, 2003. "Cartel Stability with Time-dependent Detection Probabilities," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-104/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2004. "The Pro-collusive Effect of Increased Cartel Detection Probabilities," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-117/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

  6. Leo de Haan & Jeroen Hinloopen, 2002. "Ordering the Preference Hierarchies for Internal Finance, Bank Loans, Bond and Share Issues," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-072/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Sau Lino, 2007. "New pecking order financing for innovative firms:an overview," Department of Economics Working Papers 200702, University of Turin. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  7. L. de Haan & J. Hinloopen, 1999. "Debt or equity? An empirical study of security issues by Dutch companies," WO Research Memoranda (discontinued) 577, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Bruinshoofd,W.Allard & Letterie,Wilko A., 2001. "Comovement of Sales, Retention Practice and Financing Constraints in Dutch Manufacturing," Research Memoranda 001, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]
    2. Kabir, Rezaul, 2003. "Corporate Financing in The Netherlands: Some Empirical Evidence," EIFC - Technology and Finance Working Papers 32, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies. [Downloadable!]
    3. Leo de Haan & Jeroen Hinloopen, 2002. "Ordering the Preference Hierarchies for Internal Finance, Bank Loans, Bond and Share Issues," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-072/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

  8. Jeroen Hinloopen, 1997. "Subsidizing R&D-Cooperatives," CIE Discussion Papers 1997-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Gamal Atallah, 2004. "The Allocation of Resources to Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D," CIRANO Working Papers 2004s-01, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Delia Ionascu & Kresimir Zigic, 2001. "Strategic Trade Policy and Mode of Competition: Symmetric versus Asymmetric Information," International Trade 0106001, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Ionascu, Delia & Zigic, Kresimir, 2001. "Free Trade versus Strategic Trade as a Choice Between Two 'Second-best' Policies: A Symmetric versus Asymmetric Information Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 2928, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Articles

  1. Jeroen Hinloopen & Adriaan R. Soetevent, 2008. "Laboratory evidence on the effectiveness of corporate leniency programs," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(2), pages 607-616. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen & Adriaan Soetevent, 2008. "From Overt to Tacit Collusion," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-059/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]

  2. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2008. "Empirical relevance of the Hillman condition for revealed comparative advantage: 10 stylized facts," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 40(18), pages 2313-2328. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  3. Hinloopen, Jeroen, 2006. "Internal cartel stability with time-dependent detection probabilities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1213-1229, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2005. "The Pro-collusive Effect of Increasing the Repose Period for Price Fixing Agreements," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-104/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    2. Harold Houba & Evgenia Motchenkova & Quan Wen, 2008. "Maximal Cartel Pricing and Leniency Programs," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-120/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2007. "The Pro-collusive Effect of Increasing the Repose Period for Price Fixing Agreements," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 7(1). [Downloadable!]

  4. de Haan, Leo & Hinloopen, Jeroen, 2003. "Preference hierarchies for internal finance, bank loans, bond, and share issues: evidence for Dutch firms," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 661-681, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. R.T.A. de Haas & H.M.M. Peeters, 2004. "Firms' dynamic adjustment to target capital structures in transition economies," WO Research Memoranda (discontinued) 761, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
    2. Tijs Bie & Leo Haan, 2007. "Market Timing and Capital Structure: Evidence for Dutch Firms," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 183-206, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    3. Ralph de Haas & Marga Peeters, 2004. "The Dynamic Adjustment towards Target capital Structures of Firms in," DNB Staff Reports (discontinued) 123, Netherlands Central Bank. [Downloadable!]
    4. Allard Bruinshoofd & Clemens J.M. Kool, 2004. "Dutch Corporate Liquidity Management: New Evidence on Aggregation," Working Papers 04-05, Utrecht School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Meuleman, M. & De Maeseneire, W., 2008. "Do R&D subsidies affect SME's: access to external financing," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2008-12, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. [Downloadable!]
    6. Tijs de Bie & Leo de Haan, 2004. "Does market timing drive capital structures? A panel data study for Dutch firms," DNB Working Papers 016, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
    7. R.T.A. de Haas & H.M.M. Peeters, 2004. "Firms' Dynamic Adjustment to Target Capital Structures in Transition Economies," Finance 0405014, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    8. Viet Anh Dang, 2005. "Testing the Trade-off and Pecking Order Theory: Some UK Evidence," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2005 28, Money Macro and Finance Research Group. [Downloadable!]
    9. W. Allard Bruinshoofd & Clemens J. M. Kool, 2004. "Dutch Corporate Liquidity Management," DNB Staff Reports (discontinued) 124, Netherlands Central Bank. [Downloadable!]

  5. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Mario Pianta & Andrea Vaona, 2006. "Innovation and Productivity in European Industries," Kiel Working Papers 1283, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Paul H. Jensen & Elizabeth Webster, 2004. "Examining Biases in Measures of Firm Innovation," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2004n10, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
    3. A. Altuzarra & C. Puerta & F. Serrano, 2007. "Evaluating the Relative Innovative Position of European Union Member Countries: An Empirical Analysis," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 175-188, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

  6. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "R&D Efficiency Gains Due to Cooperation," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 107-125, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Elena Cefis & Stephanie Rosenkranz & Utz Weitzel, 2009. "Effects of coordinated strategies on product and process R&D," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 193-222, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    2. TESORIERE, Antonio, 2005. "Endogenous R&D symmetry in linear duopoly with one-way spillovers," CORE Discussion Papers 2005045, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]

  7. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2002. "Price regulation in a spatial duopoly with possible non-buyers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 19-39. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Sallstrom Matthews, S.E., 2007. "The Principle of Moderate Differentiation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0720, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [Downloadable!]

  8. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles Marrewijk, 2001. "On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 1-35, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Amador, João & Cabral, Sónia & Ramos Maria, José, 2007. "International Trade Patterns over the Last Four Decades: How does Portugal Compare with other Cohesion Countries?," MPRA Paper 5996, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    2. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2004. "Locating Economic Concentration," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-066/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
    3. Ferto, Imre & Hubbard, L.J., 2003. "The Dynamics Of Agri-Food Trade Patterns - The Hungarian Case," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25851, International Association of Agricultural Economists. [Downloadable!]
    4. Abhijit Sharma & Michael Dietrich, 2004. "The Indian Economy Since Liberalisation: the Structure and Composition of Exports and Industrial Transformation (1980 – 2000)," Working Papers 2004004, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised May 2004. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2007. "Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: On Revealed Comparative Advantage And Merger Waves," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-013/2, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    6. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2005. "Empirical Relevance of the Hillman Condition for Revealed Comparative Advantage: 10 Stylized Facts," Working Papers 05-24, Utrecht School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Makoto Hisanaga, 2007. "Comparative Advantage Structure of U.S. International Services," KIER Working Papers 633, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    8. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    9. Amador, João & Cabral, Sonia & Ramos Maria, Jose, 2007. "Relative Export Structures and Vertical Specialization: A Simple Cross-Country Index," MPRA Paper 6208, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    10. Imre Ferto, 2007. "The Dynamics of Trade in Central and Eastern European Countries," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 5(1), pages 5-23. [Downloadable!]
    11. van Der Laan, Lambert & de Boom, Jan & van Oort, Frank, 2000. "Sweet Talking Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa00p141, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
    12. Fischer, Christian, 2007. "Food quality and product export performance. An empirical investigation of the EU situation," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7877, European Association of Agricultural Economists. [Downloadable!]

  9. Hinloopen, Jeroen, 2000. "Strategic R&D Co-operatives," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 153-185, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Suetens, S., 2003. "A duopoly experiment on cooperative and noncooperative r&d," Discussion Paper 77, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    2. Ruslan Lukach & Joseph Plasmans & Peter M. Kort, 2005. "Innovation Strategies in a Competitive Dynamic Setting," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    3. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Suetens, S., 2003. "Does R&D cooperation facilitate price collusion? An experiment," Discussion Paper 99, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  10. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2000. "More on subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 295-308, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. TESORIERE, Antonio, 2005. "Endogenous firm asymmetry and cooperative R&D in linear duopoly with spillovers," CORE Discussion Papers 2005086, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
    2. Sami Dakhlia & Flavio M. Menezes & Akram Temimi, 2004. "A note on duplication of R&D and R&D subsidies," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b04055, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  11. Hinloopen, Jeroen & van Marrewijk, Charles, 1999. "On the limits and possibilities of the principle of minimum differentiation1," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 735-750, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Duarte Brito & Pedro Pereira, 2007. "Product Differentiation when Competing with the Suppliers of Bottleneck Inputs," Working Papers 25, Portuguese Competition Authority. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Alain Egli, 2005. "Hotelling's Beach with Linear and Quadratic Transportation Costs: Existence of Pure Strategy Equilibria," Diskussionsschriften dp0509, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft. [Downloadable!]
    3. Alain Egli, 2005. "On Stability in Competition: Tying and Horizontal Product Differentiation," Diskussionsschriften dp0501, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft. [Downloadable!]
    4. Marcella Scrimitore, 2003. "Symmetric and Asymmetric Equilibria in a Spatial Duopoly," ERSA conference papers ersa03p194, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
    5. H. Bohn & H. Zou & J. Hinloopen & K. Aiginger & C. Keuschnigg & R. Wagner & C. Seidl & U. Cantner, 2000. "Book reviews," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 99-126, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
      • A. Ostmann & U. Leopold-Wildburger & C. Keuschnigg & H. Weikard & P. Kort & B. Gahlen & D. Wildasin & F. Butschek, 1993. "Book Reviews," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 103-128, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      • W. Krelle & H. Siebert & P. Schönfeld & R. Gradus & D. Wildasin & J. Weymark & G. Tullock & C. Keuschnigg & A. Endres & R. Schwarze & U. Kamecke & A. Wellink, 1990. "Book reviews," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 295-326, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    6. Pierre Fleckinger & Thierry Lafay, 2003. "Horizontal differentiation and price competition with sequential entry," Working Papers hal-00243021_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
    7. Alain Egli, 2007. "On Stability in Competition: Tying and Horizontal Product Differentiation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 29-38, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    8. Sallstrom Matthews, S.E., 2007. "The Principle of Moderate Differentiation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0720, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [Downloadable!]

  12. Hinloopen, Jeroen & Martin, Stephen, 1997. "Market-Structure Determinants of National Brand-Private Label Price Differences of Manufactured Food Products: Comment," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(2), pages 219-23, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

  13. Jeroen Hinloopen, 1997. "Subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 151-175, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Arijit Mukherjee, 2002. "Innovation, Licensing and Welfare," Industrial Organization 0211003, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. AMIR, Rabah & NANNERUP, Niels & STEPANOVA, Anna & EGUIAZAROVA, Elina, 2001. "Monopoly versus R&D-integrated duopoly," CORE Discussion Papers 2001051, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Arijit Mukherjee, 2001. "Does society prefer small innovation?," Keele Department of Economics Discussion Papers (1995-2001) 2001/05, Department of Economics, Keele University. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Arijit Mukherjee & Soma Mukherjee, 2002. "Licensing and the Incentive for Innovation," Keele Economics Research Papers KERP 2002/17, Centre for Economic Research, Keele University. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    6. Sami Dakhlia & Flavio M. Menezes & Akram Temimi, 2004. "A note on duplication of R&D and R&D subsidies," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b04055, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Michelle Sovinsky Goeree & Jeroen Hinloopen, 2005. "Cooperation in the Classroom: Experimenting with Research Joint Ventures," General Economics and Teaching 0503005, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    8. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2000. "More on subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 295-308, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    9. Xavier Martinez-Giralt & Rosella Nicolini, 2002. "On bilateral agreements: just a matter of matching," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 548.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC). [Downloadable!]
    10. Kresimir Zigic, 2001. "Strategic Trade Policy, the "Committed" versus "Non-Committed" Government, and R&D Spillovers," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp177, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  14. Hinloopen, Jeroen & Wagenvoort, Rien, 1997. "On the computation and efficiency of a HBP-GM estimator some simulation results," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-15, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2003. "Innovation Performance Across Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 145-161, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    2. Rien Wagenvoort & Paul Schure, 2005. "A Recursive Thick Frontier Approach To Estimating Production Efficiency," Econometrics Working Papers 0503, Department of Economics, University of Victoria. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

Did you know? There is a FAQ (frequently asked questions).

This page was last updated on 2009-12-29.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.