IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780198206477.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Politics of Planning: The Debate on Economic Planning in Britain in the 1930s

Author

Listed:
  • Ritschel, Daniel

    (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)

Abstract

The idea of `economic planning' was a central theme of the radical economic policy debate in the 1930s. Born of the inter-war economic crisis, the call for the reconstruction of the economy according to a `plan' of one kind or another spanned practically the entire spectrum of the politics of the day. The fashion for planning is often seen as the seedbed of the Keynesian revolution and the `Butskellite' consensus of thenext decade. Yet `planning' was neither uniformly Keynesian nor, in fact, indicative of political agreement over economic policy. Beneath the shared language of planning, the radical economic debate was riven by the same ideological rifts which dominated the more conventional political scene. Dr Ritschel traces the many interpretations of planning, and examines the process of ideological construction and dissemination of the new economic ideas. He finishes with an explanation of the planners' retreat, late in the decade, from the divisive economics of planning towards the less ambitious but also far less contentious alternative - the `middle way' of Keynesian economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritschel, Daniel, 1997. "The Politics of Planning: The Debate on Economic Planning in Britain in the 1930s," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198206477.
  • Handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780198206477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Ocampo, 2020. "Sir Oswald Mosley’s contribution to the Interwar Policy Debate and Fascist Economics," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 730, Universidad del CEMA.
    2. Jim Tomlinson, 2005. "Managing the economy, managing the people: Britain c.1931–70," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 58(3), pages 555-585, August.
    3. Emilio Ocampo, 2020. "The Populist Economic Policy Paradigm: Early Peronism as an Archetype," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 731, Universidad del CEMA.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780198206477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economics Book Marketing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.oup.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.