This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A review of the federal role in regional economic development

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mark Drabenstott
Abstract

Globalization is forcing regions throughout the nation to find new competitive niches in rapidly changing markets. The resulting quest for new economic engines is different in every region, driven by a region’s distinct economic assets and the specific markets it can tap. At the same time, economic experts have discovered a whole new set of strategies that offer the greatest potential in helping regions compete in the global marketplace. These new strategies focus more on the region itself, namely, helping entrepreneurs and skilled workers innovate and seize new market opportunities—an approach strikingly at odds with past strategies that often aimed at recruiting industrial facilities to a region. ; Amid these tectonic shifts in how regions grow their economies, federal policy for economic development goes on largely unchanged. The federal development effort is carried out through nine federal departments and five independent agencies, forming a sort of Rube Goldberg policy apparatus cobbled together over the past 50 years or so. There is no unifying purpose to this legion of federal programs. New questions are being raised about this policy apparatus, however. With big deficits in prospect for the federal budget, every federal program is under new budget scrutiny. The Administration’s recent proposal to redesign economic development grant programs in the federal budget was perhaps the first effort to call attention to how the federal government shapes regional economic development. It will not be the last. ; This report frames in broad terms what the federal government’s future role could be in regional economic development. Three steps are essential in framing that role. The first step is to confirm what regional development policy is today. The second step is to identify what makes regional economies grow in the 21st century. The final step is to consider how federal policy might change to help regions grow in the future.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.kansascityfed.org/RegionalAffairs/Regionalstudies/FederalReview_RegDev_605.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
This book is provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in its series Monograph with number 2005arotfrire and published in .

Handle: RePEc:fip:fedkmo:2005arotfrire

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, MO 64198-0001
Phone: (816) 881-2254
Email:
Web page: http://www.kansascityfed.org/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://app.ny.frb.org/cfpicnic/frame1.cfm

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Diane Rosenberger).

Related research
Keywords: Regional economics;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2004. "One size fits all? Towards a differentiated policy approach with respect to regional innovation systems," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2004_01, Department of City and Regional Development, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
  2. Joseph M. Sertich, Jr., 2004. "New governance in action : the Minnesota Arrowhead model," Proceedings – Rural Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue May, pages 9-24. [Downloadable!]
  3. Griliches, Zvi, 1990. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 1661-1707, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Catherine Co, 2002. "Evolution of the Geography of Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 33(4), pages 393-423. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Andrew M. Isserman, 2000. "Creating new economic opportunities : the competitive advantages of rural America in the next century," Proceedings – Rural Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Oct, pages 123-141. [Downloadable!]
  6. Robert J. Barro & Xavier Sala-i-Martin, 1991. "Convergence across States and Regions," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 22(1991-1), pages 107-182. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 630-40, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. David Huffman & John M. Quigley, 2002. "The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 403-419. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  9. Jaffe, Adam B & Trajtenberg, Manuel & Henderson, Rebecca, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 577-98, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1998. "Transport Costs, the New Economic Geography, and Rural Development," Staff General Research Papers 1201, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  11. Anselin, Luc & Varga, Attila & Acs, Zoltan, 1997. "Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 422-448, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Acs, Zoltan J. & Armington, Catherine, 2004. "The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 244-278, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  13. repec:fth:harver:1473 is not listed on IDEAS
  14. Douglas Holtz-Eakin & Chihwa Kao, 2003. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Proof Is in the Productivity," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 50, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University. [Downloadable!]
  15. Zoltan J. Acs & Attila Varga, 2004. "Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration and Technological Change," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2004-06, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  16. Acs, Zoltan J & Audretsch, David B, 1989. "Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2), pages 171-80.
  17. Stephan Weiler, 2001. "Unemployment in regional labor markets: Using structural theories to understand local jobless rates in West Virginia," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University, vol. 54(3), pages 573-592, April.
  18. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-99, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  19. Gavin A. Wood & John B. Parr, 2005. "Transaction Costs, Agglomeration Economies, and Industrial Location," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 36(1), pages 1-15. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  20. Douglass C. North, 1955. "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63, pages 243. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  21. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages S71-102, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. David Audretsch & Ronnie J. Phillips, 2007. "Entrepreneurship, State Economic Development Policy, and the Entrepreneurial University," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2007-11, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Christian Ketels, 2007. "Industrial Policy in the United States," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 147-167, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also indexes books.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.