Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Ethique et évaluation économique des interventions de santé en vue d'une définition du périmètre de soins remboursables

Contents:

Editor Info

  • Wittwer, Jérôme
  • Fleurbaey, Marc

Author Info

  • Thebaut, Clémence
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Welfare economics encompasses other public choice theories besides utilitarianism, like egalitarian social justice theory. Whether these economic frameworks provide practical tools that could be used in health technology assessment is an ongoing debate, and this study aim to contribute to answer this question. The aim of the first chapter is to review health economic evaluation guidelines and compare methods from three national health technology assessment agencies - NICE (England and Wales), IQWiG (Germany) and KCE (Belgium) - and to assess what social justice principles are implied by their methodological choices. The second chapter studies the moral dilemma raised by adaptive preferences in growth hormones treatment and bilateral cochlear implants. Three options are put forward to solve this dilemma: they are grounded on egalitarian social justice theories. The objective of the third chapter is to provide evidence about the feasibility of assessment based on equivalent income approach, developed by M. Fleurbaey, in the context of public decision making. For this application case, we focussed on antihypertensive treatments in primary prevention.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://basepub.dauphine.fr/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/10920/1/These%20THEBAUT%20EDOCIF.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    as in new window
    This book is provided by Paris Dauphine University in its series Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine with number 123456789/10920 and published in 2012.

    Order: http://basepub.dauphine.fr/xmlui/handle/123456789/10920
    Handle: RePEc:dau:thesis:123456789/10920

    Note: dissertation
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.dauphine.fr/en/welcome.html
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Health technology assessment; Social choice theory; Public decision-making; Ethics; Cost/benefit analysis; Egalitarism; Adaptive preferences; Evaluation coût/bénéfice; Evaluation des interventions de santé; justice sociale; Aide à la décision publique; Ethique; Egalitarisme; Adaptation des préférences;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Brazier, John & Ratcliffe, Julie & Salomon, Joshua A. & Tsuchiya, Aki, 2007. "Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198569824.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dau:thesis:123456789/10920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alexandre Faure).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.