IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifodrs/84.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Wachstum und Produktivität 2035 – Innovations- und Produktivitätslücken auf Ebene der Bundesländer

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Gillmann
  • Robert Lehmann
  • Jannik A. Nauerth
  • Joachim Ragnitz
  • Julia Sonnenburg
  • Michael Weber
  • Jannik André Nauerth

Abstract

Gutachten im Auftrag der Bertelsmann Stiftung In der vorliegenden Studie wird die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung der deutschen Bundesländer vor dem Hintergrund zu erwartender Trends, etwa im Hinblick auf die Produktivitäts- und Demographieentwicklung, bis ins Jahr 2035 projiziert. Ausgehend von einem Basisszenario werden vier Alternativen modelliert, in denen bestimmte Zielvorstellungen für den Lebensstandard (Bruttoinlandsprodukt je Einwohner) und die Arbeitsproduktivität (Bruttoinlandsprodukt je Erwerbstätigen) vorgegeben werden. Diese dienen dazu, mögliche wirtschaftspolitische Schlussfolgerungen abzuleiten. Im Basisszenario wird das Wirtschaftswachstum (Potenzialwachstum) im Projektionszeitraum im Vergleich zur jüngeren Vergangenheit spürbar abnehmen: Das Wachstum des realen BIP wird demnach auf rund 0,6% im Jahr 2035 fallen und sich somit gegenüber dem heutigen Stand mehr als halbieren. Auch der Lebensstandard und die Arbeitsproduktivität werden zukünftig langsamer wachsen als bisher. Wesentlicher Treiber dabei ist der sich verstärkende demographische Wandel, der dazu führt, dass diese Entwicklungen besonders zum Ende des Projektionszeitraums immer deutlicher zutage treten. Besonders stark dürften strukturschwache Bundesländer wie Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, das Saarland oder Sachsen-Anhalt betroffen sein. Aufgrund der schwierigen demographischen Rahmenbedingungen dürfte das Wirtschaftswachstum in diesen drei Bundesländern zum Ende des Projektionszeitraums hin sogar negativ ausfallen. Dem gegenüber stehen strukturstarke Bundesländer wie Baden-Württemberg, Bayern oder die Stadtstaaten Berlin und Hamburg; diese vier Bundesländer dürften in den kommenden 20 Jahren wohl das höchste Wirtschaftswachstum (von rund 1,1% im Durchschnitt) aufweisen.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Gillmann & Robert Lehmann & Jannik A. Nauerth & Joachim Ragnitz & Julia Sonnenburg & Michael Weber & Jannik André Nauerth, 2019. "Wachstum und Produktivität 2035 – Innovations- und Produktivitätslücken auf Ebene der Bundesländer," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 84.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Dresden_Studie_84.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2018. "Keine Kinder = keine Enkel: Zur Langfristigkeit demographischer Entwicklungen," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 25(04), pages 28-33, August.
    2. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    3. Robert Lehmann & Wolfgang Nagl, 2019. "Explaining spatial patterns of foreign employment in Germany," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 991-1003, July.
    4. Joachim Ragnitz, 2014. "25 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall: Anmerkungen zum Stand der Deutschen Einheit," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 21(05), pages 44-47, October.
    5. Hermann Gartner & Sabine Klinger, 2010. "Verbesserte Institutionen für den Arbeitsmarkt in der Wirtschaftskrise," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 90(11), pages 728-734, November.
    6. repec:ces:ifodre:v:24:y:2016:i:04:p:18-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Joachim Ragnitz, 2016. "Eine wirtschaftspolitische Agenda für die ostdeutschen Länder," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 23(04), pages 18-28, August.
    8. Robert Lehmann & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2016. "Zur Prognosegüte der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Stundenproduktivität," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(22), pages 57-61, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "How is Eastern Germany Holding its Own in the Crisis?," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(06), pages 12-15, December.
    2. Joachim Ragnitz, 2019. "Schlechter als erwartet, besser als gedacht: Die wirtschaftliche Situation in Ostdeutschland 30 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 26(05), pages 03-08, October.
    3. Joachim Ragnitz & Felix Rösel & Marcel Thum & Christian Hirte & Wolfgang Tiefensee & Annekatrin Niebuhr & Philipp Fink & Martin Hennicke & Heinrich Tiemann, 2019. "Der Graben zwischen Ost und West – welche Politik hilft gegen Ungleichheit?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(16), pages 03-18, August.
    4. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "Increasing Numbers of Foreign Employees in Saxony," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(01), pages 25-28, February.
    5. David Bauer & Joachim Ragnitz & Julia Sonnenburg, 2020. "Development of the Saxon Budget – an Calculation until the Year 2030," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 85.
    6. David Bauer & Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "Structural adjustment requirements in Saxony's state budget? Deficits can only be prevented by personnel savings," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(04), pages 15-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiroaki Sasaki, 2021. "Non‐renewable resources and the possibility of sustainable economic development in an economy with positive or negative population growth," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 704-720, October.
    2. Funke, Michael & Strulik, Holger, 2000. "On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 491-515, March.
    3. Rao, B. Bhaskara, 2010. "Estimates of the steady state growth rates for selected Asian countries with an extended Solow model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-53, January.
    4. Prof. Dr. Adem KALCA & Resc. Assist. Atakan DURMAZ, 2012. "Diaspora As The Instrument Of Humane Capital," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(5), pages 94-104, October.
    5. Moe, Espen, 2010. "Energy, industry and politics: Energy, vested interests, and long-term economic growth and development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1730-1740.
    6. Burda, Michael C. & Zessner-Spitzenberg, Leopold, 2024. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Price-Driven Growth in a Solow-Swan Economy with an Environmental Limit," IZA Discussion Papers 16771, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Gregory Casey & Ryo Horii, 2023. "A Generalized Uzawa Growth Theorem," ISER Discussion Paper 1215, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    8. João Juchem Neto & Julio Claeyssen, 2015. "Capital-induced labor migration in a spatial Solow model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 25-47, May.
    9. Zhongwei Xing, 2018. "The impacts of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and E-commerce on bilateral trade flows," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 565-586, July.
    10. Erich Gundlach, 2003. "Growth Effects of EU Membership: The Case of East Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 237-270, September.
    11. Boikos, Spyridon & Bucci, Alberto & Stengos, Thanasis, 2013. "Non-monotonicity of fertility in human capital accumulation and economic growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 44-59.
    12. Hajer Habib, 2023. "Remittances and Labor Supply: Evidence from Tunisia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1870-1899, June.
    13. Boucekkine, Raouf & del Rio, Fernando & Licandro, Omar, 2005. "Obsolescence and modernization in the growth process," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 153-171, June.
    14. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Peri, Giovanni, 2008. "Immigration and National Wages: Clarifying the Theory and the Empirics," CEPR Discussion Papers 6916, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    16. Das Gupta, Monica & Bongaarts, John & Cleland, John, 2011. "Population, poverty, and sustainable development : a review of the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5719, The World Bank.
    17. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    18. Kutuk, Yasin, 2022. "Inequality convergence: A world-systems theory approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 150-165.
    19. Miles Cahill & George Kosicki, 2000. "Exploring Economic Models Using Excel," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(3), pages 770-792, January.
    20. Kar, Sabyasachi & Pritchett, Lant & Raihan, Selim & Sen, Kunal, 2013. "Looking for a break: Identifying transitions in growth regimes," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 38(PB), pages 151-166.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.