Central bank intervention and market expectations
Abstractby Gabriele Galati and Will Melick In this paper we illustrate a new analytical method and present new results on the relationship between foreign exchange market intervention and market expectations in the dollar/mark and dollar/yen markets between 1985 and 1996, and 1991 and 1996, respectively. The paper improves on previous work in several important respects. First, we use official data on intervention carried out by the G10 central banks in the dollar/mark and dollar/yen markets from 1985 to 1996 and from 1991 to 1996, respectively. Second, we also consider data on market expectations of intervention derived from press reports to investigate the extent to which markets were driven by perceptions of intervention as well as actual intervention. Third, we broaden the perspective on the relationship between intervention and market expectations by looking at the entire expected distribution of future exchange rates. The four moments of estimated probability density functions (PDFs) allow a more complete characterisation of the state of market expectations on a particular day. Fourth, we use a data set on macroeconomic variables that allows for the influence of factors other than intervention on exchange rates. We follow two complementary approaches to analyse the relationship between intervention and market expectations. The first is based on an event analysis, and investigates how the moments of the PDFs changed around a number of important intervention episodes. The main advantage of this approach is that it can identify the context in which each particular intervention episode occurred and the objectives that central banks were actually pursuing. The second approach looks at averages over episodes and uses econometric techniques to reveal broad average tendencies. It has the advantage that it can summarise results for a large number of individual episodes, while at the same time controlling for the influence of factors other than intervention. Based on the event study methodology, we conclude that, depending on circumstances, particular interventions did succeed in affecting traders' expectations of future exchange rate movements in line with policymakers' objectives. We also find that the impact of interventions varies considerably across episodes. By contrast, when using econometric techniques to look at the average experience for different sub-periods, we find no evidence that intervention on its own had a statistically significant, systematic impact on expected future exchange rates, where statistical significance is measured at the usual significance levels. Likewise, while there is some evidence that for the period 1992-96 concerted interventions may have had a stronger impact on market expectations, econometric results suggest that different intervention strategies did not seem to have systematically dissimilar effects at the 95% or 90% confidence level. Hence, the interpretation of our results depends in part on the reader's views on the two approaches that we use, as well as the ultimate objectives of intervention in particular circumstances.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoThis book is provided by Bank for International Settlements in its series BIS Papers with number 10 and published in 2002.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Eijffinger, S.C.W., 1991. "Empirical evidence on foreign exchange market intervention: Where do we stand?," Open Access publications from Tilburg University urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-152907, Tilburg University.
- Almekinders, G.J. & Eijffinger, S.C.W., 1996.
"A friction model of daily Bundesbank and Federal Reserve intervention,"
Open Access publications from Tilburg University
urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-73527, Tilburg University.
- Almekinders, Geert J. & Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., 1996. "A friction model of daily Bundesbank and Federal Reserve intervention," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 1365-1380, September.
- William R. Melick & Charles P. Thomas, 1996. "Using options prices to infer PDF'S for asset prices: an application to oil prices during the Gulf crisis," International Finance Discussion Papers 541, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- Kathryn M. Dominguez, 1993. "Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?," NBER Working Papers 4532, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Edison, H.J., 1993. "The Effectiveness of Central-Bank Intervention: A Survey of the Litterature after 1982," Princeton Studies in International Economics 18, International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
- Fatum, Rasmus, 2000. "On the effectiveness of sterilized foreign exchange intervention," Working Paper Series 0010, European Central Bank.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Timo Laurmaa).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.