IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v1y2013p17-28id1051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of methods of measuring a company's intellectual capital

Author

Listed:
  • Przemysław Dominiak
  • Jacek Mercik
  • Agata Szymańska

Abstract

Intellectual capital is, in general, considered to be a component of a company’s market value, which is not always reflected in its financial statements. The authors analyzed 21 of the most common methods of measuring company’s intellectual capital. Detailed analysis of these methods made it possible to identify a set of 7 basic criteria that clearly distinguish them. The paper presents a comparative matrix of methods of measuring intellectual capital in terms of all the considered criteria. It is shown that, among the best known methods of measuring intellectual capital, there is no so-called “standard measure”, i.e. one which fulfils all the criteria at the same time.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemysław Dominiak & Jacek Mercik & Agata Szymańska, 2013. "Comparative analysis of methods of measuring a company's intellectual capital," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 23(1), pages 17-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:1:y:2013:p:17-28:id:1051
    DOI: 10.5277/ord130102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/1051%20-%20published.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5277/ord130102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Axtle-Ortiz, Miguel Angel, 2013. "Perceiving the value of intangible assets in context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 417-424.
    2. Petrash, Gordon, 1996. "Dow's journey to a knowledge value management culture," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 365-373, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavel A. Novgorodov, 2019. "Valuation of higher education institution’s intellectual capital: The issue of methodology," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 78-94, March.
    2. Przemysław Dominiak & Jacek Mercik & Agata Szymańska, 2016. "A synthetic indicator of a company’s level of intellectual capital as a hidden value," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 26(3), pages 5-20.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niamh Brennan & Brenda Connell, 2000. "Intellectual capital : current issues and policy implications," Open Access publications 10197/2916, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    2. Rossi, Cesare & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele & Greco, Marco, 2016. "The strategic assessment of intellectual capital assets: An application within Terradue Srl," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1598-1603.
    3. Christoph Voegeli, 2019. "Understanding the Current State and Future Directions of Hotel Sector Knowledge Management: A Literature Review," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 118-145, June.
    4. Marie-Annick Montalan & Béatrice Vincent, 2010. "Proposition d'un modèle d'évaluation du capital immatériel pour les organisations transversales à l'hôpital : le cas des Equipes Mobiles de Gériatrie (EMG)," Post-Print hal-00476676, HAL.
    5. Niamh Brennan, 2001. "Reporting intellectual capital in annual reports : evidence from Ireland," Open Access publications 10197/2918, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    6. Stefania Veltri & Giovanni Bronzetti, 2015. "A Critical Analysis of the Intellectual Capital Measuring, Managing, and Reporting Practices in the Non-profit Sector: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 305-318, October.
    7. Ulf Johanson & Maria Mårtensson & Matti Skoog, 2001. "Measuring to understand intangible performance drivers," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 407-437.
    8. Pathak, Saurav & Muralidharan, Etayankara, 2021. "Consequences of cross-cultural differences in perceived well-being for entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 582-596.
    9. Prusak Rafał, 2014. "Influence of selected strategic variables on the development of the intellectual capital of an enterprise," Management, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Samuel Victor Akpan & Ayandele Isaac Ayayinka & Ekwere Raymond Enang, 2022. "Knowledge Management and Corporate Performance of University of Uyo Teaching Hospital," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 534-542, October.
    11. Nikolaos Theriou & Dimitrios Maditinos & Georgios Theriou, 2011. "Knowledge Management Enabler Factors and Firm Performance: An Empirical Research of the Greek Medium and Large Firms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 97-134.
    12. Alexandra Cãƒtãƒlina Nedelcu, 2012. "Using The Hidden Value Of Intellectual Capital As A Management Tool," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(1), pages 577-584, November.
    13. Sydler, Renato & Haefliger, Stefan & Pruksa, Robert, 2014. "Measuring intellectual capital with financial figures: Can we predict firm profitability?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 244-259.
    14. Maria-Isabel Sánchez-Segura & Alejandro Ruiz-Robles & Fuensanta Medina-Dominguez, 2016. "Uncovering hidden process assets: A case study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1041-1049, December.
    15. Franco Maria Battagello & Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi, 2019. "Prioritization of Strategic Intangible Assets in Make/Buy Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Wen-Bao Lin, 2013. "Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 151-166, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:1:y:2013:p:17-28:id:1051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.