This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Analysis of Unsolicited Credit Ratings in Japan: New Evidence from Moody's

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Lisa M. Fairchild () (Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business & Management, Loyola College in Maryland, 4501 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21210, USA)
Susan M. V. Flaherty () (Department of Finance, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Stephens Hall, Room 316E, Towson, MD 21252, USA)
Yoon S. Shin () (Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business & Management, Loyola College in Maryland, 4501 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21210, USA)
Abstract

Previous studies show that the unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are lower than the solicited ratings assigned by these two agencies. The unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are based on publicly available information for a firm. However, no previous study has examined the unsolicited ratings of Moody's because Moody's does not disclose whether its ratings are solicited or unsolicited. Using Moody's solicited and unsolicited ratings collected from a survey of Japanese firms, we find that unsolicited credit ratings are still lower than solicited ratings even though firms with unsolicited ratings provide Moody's with some degree of inside information. We also compare the unsolicited ratings of S&P with those of Moody's and find that Moody's ratings are no different than those assigned by S&P although S&P's unsolicited ratings are based on public information. Therefore, we conclude that, regardless of the rating agency, unsolicited ratings are lower than solicited ratings because firms with unsolicited ratings provide incomplete private information to rating agencies.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.worldscinet.com/cgi-bin/details.cgi?type=pdf&id=pii:S0219091509001563
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
File URL: http://www.worldscinet.com/cgi-bin/details.cgi?type=html&id=pii:S0219091509001563
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. in its journal Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies.

Volume (Year): 12 (2009)
Issue (Month): 01 ()
Pages: 103-123
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:12:y:2009:i:01:p:103-123

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Tai Tone Lim).

Related research
Keywords: Credit rating agencies; unsolicited ratings; Moody's; JEL Classification: G10; JEL Classification: G20;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was launched in September 1997.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.