Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

A Framework For Tool Selection And Use In Integrated Assessment For Sustainable Development

Contents:

Author Info

  • WOUTER DE RIDDER

    ()
    (Clean Tech Research, Food & Agribusiness Research and Advisory, Rabobank International, Gildenkwartier 199, 3511 DH Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • JOHN TURNPENNY

    ()
    (Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK)

  • MÅNS NILSSON

    ()
    (Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Box 2142, SE-10314 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • ANNEKE VON RAGGAMBY

    ()
    (Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Pfalzburgerstr. 43-44, 10717 Berlin, Germany)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Integrated assessment is rapidly developing in the scientific as well as policy community. Different methods, techniques and procedures (i.e., tools) are used in these assessments. Often, the choice for using certain tools in an assessment is not well founded. This paper presents a framework that scientifically underpins the role of, and thus choice for, tools within an integrated assessment. The framework identifies four phases in an integrated assessment, which are derived from the complementarities between various forms of integrated assessments. Tasks have to be done within each of the four phases. Seven types of tools with similar characteristics are matched to those tasks. The tool framework is a theoretical construct, developed whilst keeping in mind perceptions and suggestions from eventual users. It is a first step in the development of an overarching framework for finding appropriate tools for different tasks in an assessment, and justifying the use of those tools.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.worldscinet.com/cgi-bin/details.cgi?type=pdf&id=pii:S1464333207002883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.worldscinet.com/cgi-bin/details.cgi?type=html&id=pii:S1464333207002883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. in its journal Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management.

    Volume (Year): 09 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 04 ()
    Pages: 423-441

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:09:y:2007:i:04:p:423-441

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml

    Order Information:
    Email:

    Related research

    Keywords: Sustainability assessment; tools; integrated assessment; framework; EU;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Ulrich van Suntum & Oliver Lerbs, 2011. "Theoretische Fundierung und Bewertung alternativer Methoden der Wohlfahrtsmessung," Working Paper Series of the German Council for Social and Economic Data 181, German Council for Social and Economic Data (RatSWD).
    2. Franziska Wolff & Norma Schönherr, 2011. "The Impact Evaluation of Sustainable Consumption Policy Instruments," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 43-66, March.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:09:y:2007:i:04:p:423-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tai Tone Lim).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.