The paper studies a game of common interest played infinitely many times between two players, one being aspiration driven while the other being a myopic optimizer. It is shown that the only two long run stationary outcomes are the two static equilibrium points. Robustness of long run behavior is studied to show that whenever the optimizer is allowed to make small mistakes, players are able to coordinate on the Pareto dominant equilibrium point most of the time in the long run if the speed of evolution of aspirations is sufficiently fast. However, when only the aspiring player is allowed to make small mistakes, achieving coordination is inevitable and independent of the speed at which aspirations evolve.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Economics