IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v29y2008i4p357-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economies of scale after deregulation in LTL trucking: a test case for the survivor technique

Author

Listed:
  • James N. Giordano

    (Department of Economics, Villanova School of Business, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA)

Abstract

Early critics of motor carrier deregulation believed that the policy was unwise because strong economies of scale would lead to harmful market concentration, particularly in the industry's LTL segment. Using two methodologies, the survivor technique and the trans-log cost function, this study finds that economies of scale do extend across the entire spectrum of firm sizes in LTL trucking. Long-run average cost appears to decline mildly and at a diminishing rate with increases in firm size, however, such that any cost advantage for larger firms has been insufficient to eliminate new entry and competition from smaller rivals. As a result, after the first 20 years of deregulation, the corresponding increase in market concentration has also been mild. Moreover, the consistency of results from the two methodologies gives credibility to the survivor technique as an empirical method of identifying economies of scale. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • James N. Giordano, 2008. "Economies of scale after deregulation in LTL trucking: a test case for the survivor technique," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 357-370.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:357-370
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.1411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1411
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.1411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blair, Roger D & Vogel, Ronald J, 1978. "A Survivor Analysis of Commercial Health Insurers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(3), pages 521-529, July.
    2. Giordano James N, 2003. "Using the Survivor Technique to Estimate Returns to Scale and Optimum Firm Size," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Theodore E. Keeler., 1989. "Deregulation and Scale Economies in the U. S. Trucking Industry: An Econometric Extension of the Survivor Principle," Economics Working Papers 89-100, University of California at Berkeley.
    4. T. R. Saving, 1961. "Estimation of Optimum Size of Plant by the Survivor Technique," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(4), pages 569-607.
    5. Bain, Joe S, 1969. "Survival-Ability as a Test of Efficiency," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 99-104, May.
    6. Frech, H E, III & Ginsburg, Paul B, 1974. "Optimal Scale in Medical Practice: A Survivor Analysis," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 23-36, January.
    7. James Giordano, 1997. "Returns to scale and market concentration among the largest survivors of deregulation in the US trucking industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 101-110.
    8. Jack A. Nickerson & Brian S. Silverman, 2003. "Why aren't all Truck Drivers Owner‐Operators? Asset Ownership and the Employment Relation in Interstate for‐hire Trucking," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 91-118, March.
    9. Keeler, Theodore E., 1989. "Deregulation and Scale Economies in the U.S. Trucking Industry: An Economic Extension of the Survivor Principle," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5rf5q1dx, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    10. Leonard W. Weiss, 1964. "The Survival Technique and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 246-246.
    11. Keeler, Theodore E, 1989. "Deregulation and Scale Economies in the U.S. Trucking Industry: An Econometric Extension of the Survivor Principle," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(2), pages 229-253, October.
    12. Christensen, Laurits R & Greene, William H, 1976. "Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(4), pages 655-676, August.
    13. Wang Chiang, Judy S & Friedlaender, Ann F, 1985. "Truck Technology and Efficient Market Structure," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(2), pages 250-258, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thanh Tran & Kanghyun Yoon & Stefan Genchev, 2017. "Lump‐Sum versus Pay‐As‐You‐Go: The Moderating Effect of Contract Types on the Optimal Logistics Decisions," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 547-555, June.
    2. Christian Brabänder & Maximilian Braun, 2020. "Bringing economies of integration into the costing of groupage freight," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 366-385, December.
    3. Miller, Jason W. & Phares, Jonathan & Burks, Stephen V., 2023. "Job Creation and Job Destruction Dynamics in the U.S. Truck Transportation Industry, 1995-2019," IZA Discussion Papers 16184, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy J. Yeager, 2004. "Economies of integration in banking: an application of the survivor principle," Supervisory Policy Analysis Working Papers 2004-04, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    2. H. E. Frech, 2002. "Corporate Demography and Empirical Industrial Organization: A Critical Appraisal," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 437-448.
    3. John Howard Brown, 2018. "Establishment Survivorship in U.S. Manufacturing, 1987–1992," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(2), pages 347-366, September.
    4. Christian Brabänder & Maximilian Braun, 2020. "Bringing economies of integration into the costing of groupage freight," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 366-385, December.
    5. Scott, Alex, 2015. "The value of information sharing for truckload shippers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 203-214.
    6. Junius, Karsten, 1997. "Economies of scale: A survey of the empirical literature," Kiel Working Papers 813, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Given, Ruth S., 1996. "Economies of scale and scope as an explanation of merger and output diversification activities in the health maintenance organization industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 685-713, December.
    8. French, Ben C., 1977. "PART II. The Analysis of Productive Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing: Models, Methods, and Progress," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337214, january.
    9. Kevin E. Henrickson & Wesley W. Wilson, 2008. "Compensation, Unionization, and Deregulation in the Motor Carrier Industry," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(1), pages 153-177, February.
    10. Emerson, Carol J. & Grimm, Curtis M. & Corsi, Thomas M., 1991. "The Advantage of Size in the U.S. Trucking Industry: An Application of the Survivor Technique," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1990s 319079, Transportation Research Forum.
    11. Alberto Fernández & Benito Arruñada & Manuel González, 1998. "Quasi-integration in less-than-truckload trucking," Economics Working Papers 292, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jul 2002.
    12. Tsubota, Kenmei, 2015. "Agglomeration and directional imbalance of freight rates : the role of density economies in the transport sector," IDE Discussion Papers 488, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    13. Alex Scott & Chris Parker & Christopher W. Craighead, 2017. "Service Refusals in Supply Chains: Drivers and Deterrents of Freight Rejection," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1086-1101, November.
    14. Cucculelli, Marco & Marchionne, Francesco, 2012. "Market opportunities and owner identity: Are family firms different?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 476-495.
    15. Abate, Megersa, 2014. "Does fuel price affect trucking industry’s network characteristics?: evidence from Denmark," Working papers in Transport Economics 2014:26, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    16. Deborah Haas-Wilson & Kristen Lindberg, 1999. "Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 409-415.
    17. Aleksandra Chlebicka & Michał Pietrzak, 2018. "Size of Membership and Survival Patterns of Producers’ Organizations in Agriculture—Social Aspects Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Talat Mahmood, 1997. "Survival of Newly Founded Businesses: A Log-Logistic Model Approach," CIG Working Papers FS IV 97-32, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    19. Obare, G. A. & Omamo, S. W. & Williams, J. C., 2003. "Smallholder production structure and rural roads in Africa: the case of Nakuru District, Kenya," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 245-254, May.
    20. Sharon Novak & Scott Stern, 2009. "Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 311-332, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:357-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.