IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v18y1999i3p482-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The class as case: “Reinventing” the classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Martha S. Feldman

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)

  • Anne Khademian

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Robert A. Leone

    (School of Management, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215)

Abstract

New approaches to public management provide principles by which to organize the classroom as a case. In teaching public management one can enhance learning for practice by modeling, experimenting with, and reflecting upon the principles that one is teaching the students. The principles from the new ideas about public management that can be used to organize the classroom as well are strength through diversity, continuous improvement, teamwork, and empowerment. They represent changes in governing relations across the country and globe within which the new approaches to public management rest; each of these principles has a role in the “reinvented” classroom. Such practices require institutional support of various kinds as well. © 1999 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha S. Feldman & Anne Khademian & Robert A. Leone, 1999. "The class as case: “Reinventing” the classroom," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 482-502.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:482-502
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<482::AID-PAM11>3.0.CO;2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller,Gary J., 1993. "Managerial Dilemmas," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521457699.
    2. Donald F. Kettl, 1997. "The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 446-462.
    3. Michael O'Hare, 1996. "Quality assurance for teaching in APPAM schools," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 97-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard M Walker & Ling Hin Li, 2002. "Reinventing Government? Explaining Management Reform at the Hong Kong Housing Authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(4), pages 573-592, August.
    2. Caroline Stiel, 2017. "Modern Public Enterprises: Organisational Innovation and Productivity," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1713, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Munger, Michael C, 2000. "Five Questions: An Integrated Research Agenda for Public Choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 103(1-2), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    5. Weerawardena, Jay & McDonald, Robert E. & Mort, Gillian Sullivan, 2010. "Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 346-356, October.
    6. Bongs Lainjo, 2019. "Results Based Management (RBM): An antidote to program management," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(1), pages 47-64.
    7. Weerawardena, Jay & Salunke, Sandeep & Haigh, Nardia & Sullivan Mort, Gillian, 2021. "Business model innovation in social purpose organizations: Conceptualizing dual social-economic value creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 762-771.
    8. Elango, B. & Pattnaik, Chinmay & Wieland, Jamie R., 2016. "Do business group characteristics matter? An exploration on the drivers of performance variation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3205-3212.
    9. Sabina Nuti & Milena Vainieri & Federico Vola, 2017. "Priorities and targets: supporting target-setting in healthcare," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 277-284, June.
    10. Erica Johnson & Aseem Prakash, 2007. "NGO research program: a collective action perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 40(3), pages 221-240, September.
    11. Poljak Željko, 2018. "Advocacy Coalitions in Transport Policy: A Case of Rail Sector in Croatia," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 41-56, June.
    12. Morteza Nagahi & Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain & Raed Jaradat & Vidanelage Dayarathna & Chuck Keating & Simon Goerger & Michael Hamilton, 2022. "Classification of individual managers' systems thinking skills based on different organizational ownership structures," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 258-273, March.
    13. Corey Young, 2023. "Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Governing Unconventional Natural Gas at the Local Level in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Pierre-Yves Néron, 2010. "Business and the Polis: What Does it Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 333-352, July.
    15. Cioclea, Alexandra Ema, 2011. "Critical considerations on defining and measuring performance in public organizations," MPRA Paper 33642, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Madalina Elena MIHAILESCU, 2015. "Public Service in Age of Globalization," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 35-42.
    17. Julia Beckett, 1997. "A process model for designing courses," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 142-152.
    18. Regina Pacheco, 2013. "Arm’s Length Bodies in Brazil: Contradictions and Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 131-141, June.
    19. Suhyun Baek & Sunah Kim, 2018. "Participatory Public Service Design by Gov.3.0 Design Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Martha S. Feldman, 2002. "The global management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 145-147.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:482-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.