Partial privatization of a pension system: lessons from Hungary
AbstractOn 1 January 1998 a three-pillar pension system was introduced in Hungary. It will replace about a � of the existing unfunded public system by a funded private system from 2013. The transition to this 'mixed system' is obligatory for those entering the labour market after 30 June 1998 and optional for the current labour force. Meanwhile the public pillar is also being reformed. This article assesses and evaluates these important developments. Contrary to expectations, the current government has made important changes to the on-going reform programme. These changes threaten to make benefit entitlements under the mixed system less attractive than envisaged. Despite significant funding problems within the unreformed public system, the partial privatization of the public system may cause more problems than it solves. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Journal of International Development.
Volume (Year): 12 (2000)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Feldstein, Martin, 1996.
"The Missing Piece in Policy Analysis: Social Security Reform,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 86(2), pages 1-14, May.
- Martin Feldstein, 1997. "The Missing Piece in Policy Analysis: Social Security Reform," NBER Working Papers 5413, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kornai, Janos, 1997. "The Reform of the Welfare State and Public Opinion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 339-43, May.
- Barr, Nicholas, 2002. "Reforming pensions : myths, truths, and policy choices," Open Access publications from London School of Economics and Political Science http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/, London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Roger Charlton & Roddy McKinnon, 2000. "Beyond mandatory privatization: pensions policy options for developing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 483-494.
- Soòa KILIÁNOVÁ & Igor MELICHERÈÍK & Daniel ŠEVÈOVIÈ, 2006. "A Dynamic Accumulation Model for the Second Pillar of the Slovak Pension System," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 56(11-12), pages 506-521, November.
- Andras Simonovits, 2009. "Hungarian Pension System and its Reform," IEHAS Discussion Papers 0908, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.