IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v24y2019i1p629-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does financial market growth improve income distribution? A comparison of developed and emerging market economies of the global sample

Author

Listed:
  • Sudharshan Reddy Paramati
  • Thanh Pham Thien Nguyen

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate the effects of stock market indicators, banking, and foreign direct investment inflows on income inequalities in developed and emerging market economies around the world. For this reason, the study utilizes annual data that range from 1981 to 2014 on the selected indicators. Given the nature of our variables, we employ panel autoregressive distributed lag models to explore the long‐run estimates of income inequalities. The long‐run estimates indicate that the stock market indicators have significant positive and negative impact on income inequalities in developed and emerging market economies, respectively. Further, our findings show that the banking credit adversely affects income inequalities both in developed and emerging economies. Our results also establish significant short‐run causalities among stock market indicators and income inequalities. Given these findings, we argue that the stock markets are playing an important role in reducing income inequalities in emerging economies whereas they contribute for higher inequalities in developed economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Thanh Pham Thien Nguyen, 2019. "Does financial market growth improve income distribution? A comparison of developed and emerging market economies of the global sample," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 629-646, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:24:y:2019:i:1:p:629-646
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.1683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongfen Shi & Sudeshna Paul & Sudharshan Reddy Paramati, 2022. "The impact of financial deepening on income inequality: Empirical evidence from Australia," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3564-3579, July.
    2. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen & Hasanzade, Mehrnoosh & Bahmani, Sahar, 2022. "Stock returns and income inequality: Asymmetric evidence from state level data in the U.S," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Durmuş Çagri Yildirim & Seda Yildirim & Seyfettin Erdogan & Tugba Kantarci, 2022. "Innovation—Unemployment Nexus: The case of EU countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 1208-1219, January.
    4. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Kirti Goyal & Prashant Gupta, 2023. "International journal of finance and economics: A bibliometric overview," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 9-46, January.
    5. Jelson Serafim, 2021. "Financial deepening, Stock market, Inequality and Poverty: Some African Evidence," Working Papers REM 2021/0177, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    6. Carolyn Chisadza & Mduduzi Biyase, 2023. "Financial Development and Income Inequality: Evidence From Advanced, Emerging and Developing Economies," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Song, Yuegang & Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Ummalla, Mallesh & Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Kummitha, Harshavardhan Reddy, 2021. "The effect of remittances and FDI inflows on income distribution in developing economies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 255-267.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:24:y:2019:i:1:p:629-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.