IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emjrnl/v14y2011ip1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile regression models with factor‐augmented predictors and information criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiro Ando
  • Ruey S. Tsay

Abstract

For situations with a large number of series, N, each with T observations and each containing a certain amount of information for prediction of the variable of interest, we propose a new statistical modelling methodology that first estimates the common factors from a panel of data using principal component analysis and then employs the estimated factors in a standard quantile regression. A crucial step in the model‐building process is the selection of a good model among many possible candidates. Taking into account the effect of estimated regressors, we develop an information‐theoretic criterion. We also investigate the criterion when there is no estimated regressors. Results of Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the proposed criterion performs well in a wide range of situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiro Ando & Ruey S. Tsay, 2011. "Quantile regression models with factor‐augmented predictors and information criterion," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14, pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:14:y:2011:i::p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ectj.2011.14.issue-1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chao, Shih-Kang & Härdle, Wolfgang K. & Yuan, Ming, 2021. "Factorisable Multitask Quantile Regression," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 794-816, August.
    2. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
    3. González-Rivera, Gloria & Maldonado, Javier & Ruiz, Esther, 2019. "Growth in stress," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 948-966.
    4. Gonzalez Rivera, Gloria & Rodríguez Caballero, Carlos Vladimir & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2021. "Expecting the unexpected: economic growth under stress," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 32148, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    5. Chen Jau-er, 2015. "Factor instrumental variable quantile regression," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 71-92, February.
    6. Chuliá, Helena & Koser, Christoph & Uribe, Jorge M., 2021. "Analyzing the Nonlinear Pricing of Liquidity Risk according to the Market State," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    7. repec:zbw:bofitp:2012_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Weichi Wu & Zhou Zhou, 2017. "Nonparametric Inference for Time-Varying Coefficient Quantile Regression," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 98-109, January.
    9. Siklos, Pierre L., 2012. "No coupling, no decoupling, only mutual inter-dependence: Business cycles in emerging vs. mature economies," BOFIT Discussion Papers 17/2012, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    10. Aslanidis, Nektarios & Christiansen, Charlotte, 2014. "Quantiles of the realized stock–bond correlation and links to the macroeconomy," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 321-331.
    11. Anthoulla Phella, 2020. "Consistent Specification Test of the Quantile Autoregression," Papers 2010.03898, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    12. C. Davino & R. Romano & D. Vistocco, 2022. "Handling multicollinearity in quantile regression through the use of principal component regression," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(2), pages 153-174, August.
    13. Giglio, Stefano & Kelly, Bryan & Pruitt, Seth, 2016. "Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: An empirical evaluation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 457-471.
    14. Yongxia Zhang & Qi Wang & Maozai Tian, 2022. "Smoothed Quantile Regression with Factor-Augmented Regularized Variable Selection for High Correlated Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-30, August.
    15. Tomohiro Ando & Jushan Bai, 2020. "Quantile Co-Movement in Financial Markets: A Panel Quantile Model With Unobserved Heterogeneity," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 266-279, January.
    16. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2018. "What role for human capital in the growth process: new evidence from endogenous latent factor panel quantile regressions," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 65(5), pages 501-527, November.
    17. Helena Chuliá & Ignacio Garrón & Jorge M. Uribe, 2021. ""Vulnerable Funding in the Global Economy"," IREA Working Papers 202106, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Mar 2021.
    18. Anthoulla Phella, 2020. "Forecasting With Factor-Augmented Quantile Autoregressions: A Model Averaging Approach," Papers 2010.12263, arXiv.org.
    19. Guodong Li & Yang Li & Chih-Ling Tsai, 2015. "Quantile Correlations and Quantile Autoregressive Modeling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 246-261, March.
    20. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2014. "Estimating and testing a quantile regression model with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 101-113.
    21. Uribe, Jorge M. & Chuliá, Helena & Guillén, Montserrat, 2017. "Uncertainty, systemic shocks and the global banking sector: Has the crisis modified their relationship?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 52-68.
    22. Siklos, Pierre L., 2012. "No coupling, no decoupling, only mutual inter-dependence : Business cycles in emerging vs. mature economies," BOFIT Discussion Papers 17/2012, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:14:y:2011:i::p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.