Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Follow the leader? Adoption behavior in food retailers' decision to offer fresh irradiated ground beef

Contents:

Author Info

  • Edward C. Jaenicke

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Penn State University, 208A Armsby, University Park, PA 16802)

  • R. Wesley Harrison

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, 101 Ag Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-5604)

  • Kimberly L. Jensen

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, The University of Tennessee, 2621 Morgan Circle, 302 Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996-4518)

  • Paul M. Jakus

    (Department of Economics, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-3530)

Abstract

During the 14-month period from May 2002 through June 2003, approximately 10% of U.S. supermarkets began to offer fresh irradiated ground beef under the stores' own labels. Using a survey of supermarket store managers from this period, the authors investigate the factors that influenced stores' adoption of irradiated ground beef. Results from the adoption model show that factors associated with competition, merchandising philosophy, and structure in the food retailing industry play a strong role in the decision. Among other results, it was found that variables relating to a competitor's adoption status and proximity can increase the likelihood of a store's adoption. [EconLit citations: L660, M310, Q180] © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 22: 547-568, 2006.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.20103
File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Agribusiness.

Volume (Year): 22 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 547-568

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:22:y:2006:i:4:p:547-568

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Brian T. Ratchford, 1990. "Commentary on “Marketing Applications of the Economics of Product Variety”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 207-211.
  2. Fox, John A. & Hayes, Dermot J. & Shogren, Jason F. & Kliebenstein, James, 1996. "Experimental Methods in Consumer Preference Studies," Staff General Research Papers, Iowa State University, Department of Economics 5178, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  3. Stephen G. Sapp & Wendy J. Harrod & Lijun Zhao, 1995. "Social demographic and attitudinal determinants of consumer acceptance of food irradiation," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 117-130.
  4. Yuxin Chen & James D. Hess & Ronald T. Wilcox & Z. John Zhang, 1999. "Accounting Profits Versus Marketing Profits: A Relevant Metric for Category Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 208-229.
  5. Trichy Krishan & Kitty Koelemeijer & Ram Rao, 2002. "Consistent Assortment Provision and Service Provision in a Retail Environment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 54-73, April.
  6. Rodolfo M. Nayga & Wipon Aiew & John P. Nichols, 2005. "Information Effects on Consumers' Willingness to Purchase Irradiated Food Products," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 37-48.
  7. Frenzen, Paul D. & Majchrowicz, T. Alexander & Buzby, Jean C. & Imhoff, Beth, 2000. "Consumer Acceptance of Irradiated Meat and Poultry Products," Agricultural Information Bulletins, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 33616, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  8. Preyas S. Desai, 2000. "Multiple Messages to Retain Retailers: Signaling New Product Demand," Marketing Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 381-389, August.
  9. Edward W. McLaughlin & Peter Fredericks, 1994. "New product procurement behavior of us supermarket chains: Implications for food and agribusiness suppliers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(6), pages 481-490.
  10. Connor, John M., 1999. "Evolving Research On Price Competition In The Grocery Retailing Industry: An Appraisal," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 28(2), October.
  11. Swann, Peter, 1990. "Product competition and the dimensions of product space," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 281-295, June.
  12. Buzby, Jean C. & Fox, John A. & Ready, Richard C. & Crutchfield, Stephen R., 1998. "Measuring Consumer Benefits Of Food Safety Risk Reductions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(01), July.
  13. Henson, Spencer, 1995. "Demand-side constraints on the introduction of new food technologies: The case of food irradiation," Food Policy, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 111-127, April.
  14. Kinsey, Jean D. & Jacobson, Elaine M. & Behl, Ajay S. & Seltzer, Jonathan M., 2003. "The 2003 Supermarket Panel Annual Report," Supermarket Panel Reports, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center 14354, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
  15. Park, John L., 2001. "Supermarket Product Selection Uncovered: Manufacturer Promotions And The Channel Intermediary," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IAMA), International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IAMA), vol. 4(02).
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Jaenicke, Edward C. & Chikasada, Mitsuko, 2006. "Separate Decision-Making for Supermarket Leaders and Followers: The Case of Whether or Not to Offer Irradiated Ground Beef," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(03), November.
  2. Isabel Bardaj� & Belén Iráizoz & Manuel Rap�n, 2009. "Protected geographical indications and integration into the agribusiness system," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 198-214.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:22:y:2006:i:4:p:547-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.