IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v11y1995i4p309-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pesticide use and produce quality: Do existing market channels|structure provide adequate information?

Author

Listed:
  • Enrique E. Figueroa

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-7801)

Abstract

Pesticide use|nonuse in the production and distribution of produce has become an important public policy issue. It is also a marketing issue for certain firms. This article provides an overview of relevant research on the topic. It is apparent that the current structure and purpose of USDA grades and standards is not the most appropriate vehicle for providing market participants with information regarding pesticides in|on produce. Particularly pressing is the need for further research focused on how the market system and|or structure can facilitate and clarify the issue for policymakers and market participants. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrique E. Figueroa, 1995. "Pesticide use and produce quality: Do existing market channels|structure provide adequate information?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 309-316.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:11:y:1995:i:4:p:309-316
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(199507/08)11:4<309::AID-AGR2720110403>3.0.CO;2-N
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert D. Weaver & David J. Evans & A. E. Luloff, 1992. "Pesticide use in tomato production: Consumer concerns and willingness-to-pay," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 131-142.
    2. Jordan, Jeffrey L. & Shewfelt, R.L. & Prussia, Stanley E. & Hurst, W.C., 1985. "Estimating Implicit Marginal Prices Of Quality Characteristics Of Tomatoes," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Jordan, Jeffery L. & Shewfelt, R. L. & Prussia, S. E. & Hurst, W. C., 1985. "Estimating Implicit Marginal Prices of Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 139-146, December.
    4. Stephen L. Ott, 1990. "Supermarket shoppers' pesticide concerns and willingness to purchase certified pesticide residue-free fresh produce," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 593-602.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stockton, Matthew C. & Capps, Oral Jr., 2005. "Nerlovian Hedonic Models For Three Different Container Sizes Of Fluid Milk," A.E. Research Series 305038, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    2. Tollner, Ernest W. & Prussia, Stanley E. & Florkowski, Wojciech J., 2006. "Modeling Product Flow Through a Generic Post-Harvest Distribution System," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(2), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Richards, Timothy J. & Jeffrey, Scott R., 1995. "Hedonic Pricing of Dairy Bulls - An Alternative Index of Genetic Merit," Project Report Series 24035, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    4. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji O., 1998. "Predicting Consumer Risk Aversions to Synthetic Pesticide Residues: A Logistic Analysis," P Series 36740, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Mundy, Karen & Coale, Charles W., Jr. & Sterrett, Susan B., 1997. "To Market. . To Market . . . Seven Steps To A Marketing Plan For Horticultural Products," Report Papers 14846, Virginia Tech, Rural Economic Analysis Program (REAP).
    7. Jerop, Rebecca, 2012. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Dairy Goat Milk in Siaya County, Kenya," Research Theses 243449, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    8. Goodwin, Harold L., Jr. & Fuller, Stephen W. & Capps, Oral, Jr. & Asgill, Oladimagi W., 1988. "Factors Affecting Fresh Potato Price In Selected Terminal Markets," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Bierlen, Ralph W. & Grunewald, Orlen C., 1995. "Price Incentives For Commercial Fresh Tomatoes," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Gabrielyan, Gnel & Marsh, Thomas L., 2012. "Domestic and Export Price Formation of U.S. Hops," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124722, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Hoelper, Antonia L. & Marra, Michele C., 1991. "Quality Changes And Limited Marketing Season Effects On The Demand For Fresh Blueberries," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 1-7, October.
    12. Eric Giraud-Héraud & Maria Aguiar Fontes & Alexandra Seabra Pinto, 2014. "Crise sanitaires de l'alimentation et analyses comportementales," Working Papers hal-00949126, HAL.
    13. Biing-Hwan Lin & Steven Payson & Jane Wertz, 1996. "Opinions of professional buyers toward organic produce: A case study of mid-Atlantic market for fresh tomatoes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(1), pages 89-97.
    14. Figueroa, Enrique E., 1993. "Pesticide Use and Produce Quality: Evaluating the Role of Private Sector Institutions," Staff Papers 121334, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    15. Iddo Kan, 2008. "Yield quality and irrigation with saline water under environmental limitations: the case of processing tomatoes in California," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(1), pages 57-66, January.
    16. Maria Travisi, Chiara & Nijkamp, Peter & Vindigni, Gabriella, 2006. "Pesticide risk valuation in empirical economics: a comparative approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 455-474, April.
    17. Powers, Nicholas J. & Heifner, Richard G., 1993. "Federal Grade Standards for Fresh Produce: Linkages to Pesticide Use," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309690, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Roosen, Jutta & Fox, John A. & Hennessy, David A. & Schreiber, Alan, 1998. "Consumers' Valuation Of Insecticide Use Restrictions: An Application To Apples," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Ekanem, Enefiok P. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1993. "Estimating Marginal Implicit Prices For Selected Quality Attributes Of Hybrid Seed Corn," Staff Papers 13473, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John, 1997. "Consumer Response to Integrated Pest Management and Organic Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis," P Series 36727, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:11:y:1995:i:4:p:309-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.