This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Paying for Enhanced Service: Comparing Patients' Experiences in a Concierge and General Medicine Practice

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Justin M. Ko (Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Author-Name: Hector P. Rodriguez, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA)
David G. Fairchild (Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Author-Name: Angie Mae C. Rodday, The Health Institute, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
Dana G. Safran (Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA The Health Institute, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
Abstract

Background: Concierge medical practice is a relatively new and somewhat controversial development in primary-care practice. These practices promise patients more personalized care and dedicated service, in exchange for an annual membership fee paid by patients. The experiences of patients using these practices remain largely undocumented. Abstract: Objective: To assess the experiences of patients in a concierge medicine practice compared with those in a general medicine practice. Abstract: Methods: Stratified random samples of patients empanelled to each of the four doctors who practice at both a general medicine and a concierge medicine practice separately situated at an academic medical center were drawn. Patients were eligible for the study if they had a visit with the physician between January and May 2006. The study questionnaire (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey, supplemented with items from the Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey) was administered by mail to 100 general medicine patients per physician (n - 400) and all eligible concierge medicine patients (n - 201). Patients who completed the survey and affirmed the study physician as their primary-care physician formed the analytic sample (n - 344) that was used to compare the experiences of concierge medicine and general medicine patients. Models controlled for respondent characteristics and accounted for patient clustering within physicians using physician fixed effects. Abstract: Results: Patients' experiences with organizational features of care, comprising care co-ordination (p < 0.01), access to care (p < 0.001) and interactions with office staff (p < 0.001), favored concierge medicine over general medicine practice. The quality of physician-patient interactions did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the patients of the concierge medicine practice were more likely to report that their physician spends sufficient time in clinical encounters than patients of the general medicine practice (p < 0.003). Abstract: Conclusion: The results suggest patients of the concierge medicine practice experienced and reported enhanced service, greater access to care, and better care co-ordination than those of the general medicine practice. This suggests that further study to understand the etiology of these differences may be beneficial in enhancing patients' experience in traditional primary-care practices.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/pt/re/tpt/pdfhandler.01312067-200902020-00005.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view
File URL: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/pt/re/tpt/fulltext.01312067-200902020-00005.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

Volume (Year): 2 (2009)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 95-103
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:thepat:v:2:y:2009:i:2:p:95-103

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Remco Bouckaert).

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
D - Microeconomics
I - Health, Education, and Welfare
Z - Other Special Topics
I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.