Advanced Search

The Effect of Item Screeners on the Quality of Patient Survey Data: A Randomized Experiment of Ambulatory Care Experience Measures

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hector P. Rodriguez

    (Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA)

  • Ted von. Glahn

    (Pacific Business Group on Health, San Francisco, California, USA)

  • Angela Li

    (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)

  • William H. Rogers

    (Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)

  • Dana Gelb. Safran

    (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Background: The use of item screeners is viewed as an essential feature of quality survey design because only respondents who are 'qualified' to answer questions that apply to a subset of the sample are directed to answer. However, empirical evidence supporting this view is scant. Abstract: Objective: This study compares data quality resulting from the administration of ambulatory care experience measures that use item screeners versus tailored 'not applicable' options in response scales. Abstract: Methods: Patients from the practices of 367 primary care physicians in 65 medical groups were randomly assigned to receive one of two versions of a well validated ambulatory care experience survey. Respondents (n - 2240) represent random samples of active established patients from participating physicians' panels. The 'screener' survey version included item screeners for five test items and the 'no screener' version included tailored 'not applicable' options in response scales instead of using screeners. The main outcomes measures were data quality resulting from the two item versions, including the mean item scores, the level of missing values, outgoing patient sample sizes needed to achieve adequate medical group-level reliability, and the relative ranking of medical groups. Abstract: Results: Mean survey item scores generally did not differ by version. There were consistently fewer respondents to the 'screener' versions than 'no screener' versions. However, because the 'screener' versions improved measurement precision, smaller outgoing patient samples were needed to achieve adequate medical group-level reliability for four of the five items than for the 'no screener' version. The relative ranking of medical groups did not differ by item version. Abstract: Conclusion: Screeners appear to reduce noise by ensuring that respondents who are not 'qualified' to answer a question are screened out instead of providing unreliable responses. The increased precision resulting from 'screener' versions appears to more than offset the higher item non-response rates compared with 'no screener' versions.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/pt/re/tpt/pdfhandler.01312067-200902020-00009.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view
    File URL: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/pt/re/tpt/fulltext.01312067-200902020-00009.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 135-141
    Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
    Handle: RePEc:wkh:thepat:v:2:y:2009:i:2:p:135-141

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://thepatient.adisonline.com/

    For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    Related research

    Keywords:

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:thepat:v:2:y:2009:i:2:p:135-141

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.