Candida M. Mastroianni (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Caterina Viscomi (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Silvia Ceniti (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Rosanna De Simone (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Aldo Filice (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Gennaro Gadaleta Caldarola (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Stefania Infusino (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Caterina Manfredi (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Antonio Rea (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Claudia Sandomenico (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Salvatore Turano (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy) Francesco Serrano (Siderno Hospital, Siderno, Italy) Giovanni Condemi (Siderno Hospital, Siderno, Italy) Carla Cortese (San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Crotone, Italy) Tullia Prantera (San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Crotone, Italy) Salvatore Palazzo (Mariano Santo Hospital, Cosenza, Italy)
Abstract
Background: In recent years, patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life have become important areas of clinician focus in general cancer management. Patients' preferences for, and/or satisfaction with, oral versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy schedules may have a major impact on such outcomes. Objective: To evaluate preferences for oral or IV chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 12 hospitals in Southern Italy, in which 22 patients with advanced colorectal cancer received one cycle of oral capecitabine +- irinotecan or oxaliplatin, followed by one cycle of an IV de Gramont or similar regimen (arm A), or the same regimens in reverse order (arm B). Patients were aged 50-70 years and 21% had a higher level of education (graduate or similar). Patients received oral capecitabine 3500 mg/m2/day for 7 days (+- irinotecan 180 mg/m2 or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 only), followed by an IV de Gramont regimen +- irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin (FOLFOX); or the two schedules administered in reverse order. The main outcome measure was patients' preferences for oral versus IV chemotherapy, as determined by a pre- and post-treatment therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). Results: Before treatment, 75% of patients preferred oral therapy. Characteristics that patients considered to be important were that treatment should not interfere with daily activities (100% of patients) and should not cause fatigue (95%), diarrhea (76%), or painful mouth ulcers (76%); other factors considered important were the risk of infection and nausea (90%), and that treatment could be administered at home (65%). After receiving both chemotherapy schedules, only 45% of patients preferred oral therapy, while 55% preferred IV therapy. Among the latter, the most important characteristics influencing treatment choice were less nausea (66%), fewer mood effects (65%), the safety of hospital IV treatment (62%), less interference with family relationships (55%), less vomiting (55%), less interference with daily activities (50%), and less diarrhea (50%). Although the order in which patients received therapy did not influence treatment preference, significantly fewer patients with a lower rather than higher educational level preferred oral therapy (47% vs 80%; chi-square test = 9.9; p_=_0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that there may be a correlation between educational level and the preference of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for oral or IV chemotherapy. DOI: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00005
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods D - Microeconomics I - Health, Education, and Welfare Z - Other Special Topics I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets