Cost Effectiveness of Oromucosal Cannabis-Based Medicine (Sativex) for Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis
AbstractBackground:Background: Spasticity is common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and is a major contributor to disability. Sativex, an oromucosal spray containing cannabis-based medicinal products, has been found to be effective in reducing spasticity symptoms. Abstract: Objective:Objective: Our objective was to estimate the cost effectiveness of Sativex plus oral anti-spasticity medicines compared with the current standard treatment for moderate or severe spasticity in MS in the UK. Abstract: Methods:Methods: A Markov model was used to assess the costs and benefits of Sativex plus oral anti-spasticity medicines or current standard treatment based on their effects on the quality of life of patients. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of costs per additional QALY gained over 5 years of treatment. One-way, multi-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the findings. Abstract: Results:Results: In the base case, Sativex plus oral anti-spasticity medicines resulted in incremental costs of £7600 and a QALY gain of 0.15 per person over 5 years (ICER - £49 300 per QALY).[year 2009 data for costs]. Findings were sensitive to the costs of Sativex (price and dose) and differences in utilities between responders and non-responders. Abstract: Conclusions:Conclusions: Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000 per QALY, Sativex appears unlikely to be considered cost effective by UK funders of healthcare for spasticity in MS. This is unfortunate, since it appears that Sativex use is likely to benefit some patients in the management of this common consequence of MS.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.
Volume (Year): 30 (2012)
Issue (Month): 12 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/
Antispastics; Baclofen; Botulinum-toxins; Cost-utility; Multiple-sclerosis; Nabiximols; Probabilistic-sensitivity-analysis.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
- D - Microeconomics
- I - Health, Education, and Welfare
- Z - Other Special Topics
- I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
- I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
- I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.