Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The State of Health Economic Research in South Africa: A Systematic Review

Contents:

Author Info

  • Paul Gavaza

    (Appalachian College of Pharmacy, Oakwood, VA, USA)

  • Karen L. Rascati

    (College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA)

  • Abiola O. Oladapo

    (College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA)

  • Star Khoza

    (College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Background:Background: Economic factors are a limiting factor toward the implementation of many health programmes and interventions. Economic evaluation has a great potential to contribute toward cost-effective healthcare delivery in South Africa. Little is known about the characteristics and quality of health economic (including pharmacoeconomic) research in South Africa. Abstract: Objective and Methods:Objective and Methods: This study assessed the state of health economic (including pharmacoeconomic) research in South Africa. PUBMED, MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, EconLit and PsycINFO databases were searched to identify health economic articles pertaining to South Africa published between 1 January 1977 and 30 April 2010. The searches used the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and text words alone and in combination: 'costs', 'health' and 'South Africa'. Our study included only original economic studies/analyses that pertained to South Africa, addressed a health-related topic, and had a statement or word in the title, abstract or keywords that indicated that an economic (including cost) analysis had been conducted. The study only included complete peer-reviewed publications (e.g. abstracts were excluded) that were reported in the English language. Two reviewers independently scored each article in the final sample using the data collection form designed for the study. Abstract: Results:Results: In total, 108 studies investigating a wide variety of diseases were included in the study. These articles were published in 39 different journals mostly based outside of South Africa between 1977 and 2010. On average, each article was written by three authors. Most first authors had medical/clinical training and resided in South Africa at the time of publication of their study. Based on a 1-10 scale, with 10 indicating the highest quality, the mean quality score for all studies was 7.59 (SD 1.42) and half of the articles were of good quality (score 8-10) The quality of studies was related to the country in which the journal publishing the article was based (outside South Africa - higher); current residence of the primary author (outside South Africa - higher); method of economic analysis (economic evaluations higher than cost studies); type of data used (secondary higher than primary); primary training of the first author (health economics/pharmacoeconomics - higher); type of medical function (diagnosis - higher); study perspective (societal - higher); primary health intervention (pharmaceuticals - higher); study design (modelling - higher); number of authors (more - higher); and year of publication (more recent - higher) [p ≤ 0.05]. Abstract: Conclusion:Conclusion: Half of the articles were of poor or fair quality. Measures are needed to promote the commissioning of more and better quality health economic and pharmacoeconomic studies in South Africa.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://PharmacoEconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/pec/pdfhandler.00019053-201230100-00005.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL: http://PharmacoEconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/pec/fulltext.00019053-201230100-00005.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

    Volume (Year): 30 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 10 ()
    Pages: 925-940

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:30:y:2012:i:10:p:925-940

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/

    Related research

    Keywords: Decision-making; Health-economics; Health-policy; Healthcare-expenditure; Pharmacoeconomics.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:30:y:2012:i:10:p:925-940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.