Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Using QALYs in Cancer: A Review of the Methodological Limitations


Author Info

  • Martina Garau

    (Office of Health Economics, London, UK)

  • Koonal K. Shah

    (Office of Health Economics, London, UK)

  • Anne R. Mason

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

  • Qing Wang

    (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK)

  • Adrian Towse

    (Office of Health Economics, London, UK)

  • Michael F. Drummond

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)


The objective of this paper is to examine how well the QALY captures the health gains generated by cancer treatments, with particular focus on the methods for constructing QALYs preferred by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Data were obtained using a keyword search of the MEDLINE database and a hand search of articles written by leading researchers in the subject area (with follow up of the references in these articles). Key arguments were discussed and developed at an oncology workshop in September 2009 at the Office of Health Economics. Three key issues emerged. First, the EQ-5D, NICE's preferred measure of health-related quality of life (QOL) in adults, has been found to be relatively insensitive to changes in health status of cancer patients. Second, the time trade-off, NICE's preferred technique for estimating the values of health states, involves making assumptions that are likely to be violated in end-of-life scenarios. Third, the practice of using valuations of members of the general population, as recommended by NICE, is problematic because such individuals typically display a misunderstanding of what it is really like for patients to live with cancer. Because of the way in which it is constructed, the QALY shows important limitations in terms of its ability to accurately capture the value of the health gains deemed important by cancer patients. A research agenda for addressing these limitations is proposed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

File URL:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

Volume (Year): 29 (2011)
Issue (Month): 8 ()
Pages: 673-685

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:29:y:2011:i:8:p:673-685

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research

Keywords: Cancer; Cost-utility; Patient-preference; Quality-adjusted-life-years; Utility-measurement.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Jose Luis Pinto Prades & Fernando Sanchez Martínez & Belen Corbacho, 2011. "Valuing qalys at the end of life," Working Papers 11.15, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:29:y:2011:i:8:p:673-685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.