This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Carmustine Implants for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Gabriel Rogers (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Ruth Garside (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Stuart Mealing (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Martin Pitt (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Rob Anderson (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Matthew Dyer (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Ken Stein (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Margaret Somerville (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK)
Abstract

Background: High-grade gliomas are aggressive brain tumours that are extremely challenging to treat effectively. The intracranial implantation of carmustine wafers (BCNU-W), which delivers chemotherapy directly to the affected area, may prolong survival in this population. However, no attention has yet been paid to the economic implications of BCNU-W in this setting. Objective: To investigate the cost effectiveness of BCNU-W as an adjunct to surgery followed by radiotherapy, compared with surgery plus radiotherapy alone. Newly diagnosed, operable grade III and IV gliomas in a population with a mean age of 55 years were considered. Methods: A Markov cost-utility model was developed in Microsoft(R) Excel, adopting a UK NHS perspective. Transition probabilities and cost data (year 2004 values) were obtained from published literature or expert opinion. The model incorporated utility values, obtained from members of the public, reflecting the quality of life associated with high-grade glioma. The effects of uncertainty were explored through extensive one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Surgery with the implantation of BCNU-W followed by radiotherapy costs Lstg 54 Conclusion: Compared with usual care for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas, BCNU-W is unlikely to be considered a cost-effective use of healthcare resources when judged by the standards commonly adopted in England and Wales. However, the dreadful prognosis of the condition and the paucity of alternative therapies are additional issues that healthcare commissioners may choose to take into account when considering an adoption decision.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/phe/pdfhandler.00019053-200826010-00004.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view
File URL: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/phe/fulltext.00019053-200826010-00004.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

Volume (Year): 26 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 33-44
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:26:y:2008:i:1:p:33-44

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Remco Bouckaert).

Related research
Keywords: Carmustine-polifeprosan-20-wafer Cost-utility Glioma

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
D - Microeconomics
I - Health, Education, and Welfare
Z - Other Special Topics
I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1900 working paper series are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2008-4-27.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.