Advanced Search

Monitoring Outcomes of Care in Older People in a UK Community Setting: The North East Fife Outcomes Project

Contents:

Author Info

  • Petra Kliempt

    (University of Dundee, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland)

  • Danny Ruta

    (University of Dundee, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Although process measures of care have traditionally been used to assess the quality of healthcare, there is little evidence, for the majority of healthcare activities, to support a clear relationship between processes of care and resulting health gains. Outcomes monitoring is increasingly being advocated as a vital component of healthcare, particularly with the increasingly aging population. A consensus is emerging that routine systems of outcome monitoring are fundamental to rational clinical decision-making and public policy. There are several issues that need to be considered when implementing a routine system of outcome monitoring; this article addresses these issues in older people within a UK community setting in the context of an innovative observational feasibility study (The North East Fife Outcomes Project). This project 1. determined which outcomes of health and social care are the most important to this patient group; and 2. identified appropriate measures for relevant outcomes suitable for use in a community setting. Key patient characteristics and relevant clinical and social care process variables were then recorded, concomitant variables such as disease severity and comorbidities were taken into account and quality-of-life assessment measures recorded. For the success of any outcomes monitoring system, feedback to end-users is important. The North East Fife Project will assess the feasibility and value of feedback at the individual patient level and at the aggregate level. More research, particularly from large observational studies, is needed to address reliability and validity issues, biases and inaccuracies with routinely collected data and to further determine the value of routine outcomes monitoring.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/pt/re/dmo/pdfhandler.00115677-200007010-00005.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view
    File URL: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/pt/re/dmo/fulltext.00115677-200007010-00005.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal Disease Management & Health Outcomes.

    Volume (Year): 7 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 39-47
    Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
    Handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:7:y:2000:i:1:p:39-47

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/

    For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    Related research

    Keywords: Elderly; Pharmacoeconomics; Quality of care;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:7:y:2000:i:1:p:39-47

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.