This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Lessons from Early Experience with Pay for Performance

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Tim Doran (National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Abstract

Pay-for-performance schemes share the common approach of offering financial incentives to healthcare providers for achieving specified performance targets. Such schemes are becoming increasingly popular with healthcare policy makers and funders worldwide, despite a relative lack of evidence on their long-term effects. This article examines the emerging evidence and its likely consequences for the future development of pay for performance. Successful schemes are likely to be those that use evidence-based targets; focus on aspects of care for which there is a professional consensus on the need for improvement; incentivize practitioners across the range of performance; allow for professional judgment and discretion; offer adequate incentives; adjust for risks outside practitioners' control; involve patients in the design and implementation stages; make performance data publicly available; have a proper infrastructure in terms of adequate information technology systems and a receptive group of professionals; and are supported by other effective quality improvement initiatives. However, even the most successful schemes carry the risk of unintended effects, such as loss of professionalism, neglect of unincentivized activities, and fraudulent behavior. These risks need to be weighed against the potential benefits of financial incentives, and, in any future pay-for-performance schemes, should be mitigated during development and carefully monitored during implementation.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/pt/re/dmo/pdfhandler.00115677-200816020-00001.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view
File URL: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/pt/re/dmo/fulltext.00115677-200816020-00001.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal Disease Management & Health Outcomes.

Volume (Year): 16 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 69-77
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:69-77

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Remco Bouckaert).

Related research
Keywords: Disease-management-programmes Quality-of-care

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
D - Microeconomics
I - Health, Education, and Welfare
Z - Other Special Topics
I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 2000 working paper series are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.